On Monday, January 10, 2005, 8:50:37 PM, Andrew wrote:

CA> Thanks, Pete.

CA> I was thinking that Sniffer's l33t ninja skillz would be well-used for
CA> searching a large corpus of URIs, particularly the current bout of
CA> spammers you and I mentioned before Xmas (the ones that are specifying
CA> the domain name, not a URL, and which Sniffer is catching because of the
CA> consistent instructions, regardless of the dynamically changing domain
CA> names), as a URI filter might miss them because of obfuscation, or might
CA> miss the real payload.  Sniffer would catch these URIs, because it only
CA> cares about tokenized text, not whether that text was detected in a URL.

CA> There would still be a place for both SURBL lookups and Sniffer in that
CA> scenario, because they are refreshed on different schedules and have
CA> independent spamtraps feeding them.

CA> I wasn't thinking about Sniffer incorporating a real-time lookup; I
CA> agree with your direction for the product.  For the reason you cited,
CA> I'll go a little further and say that Sniffer would have to really break
CA> out in a new direction to be worth implementing a real-time lookup of
CA> some sort.

I agree. Thanks for clarifying.

The only real-time stuff we have planned is proactive -- where trusted
peers and our control nodes will share some real time data eventually.

With regard to incorporating SURBL in SNF... I wonder about that for a
lot of reasons.

With a sufficient hardware it would be possible to fold in SURBL and a
number of other services (SBL for example) - though the rulebase would
be quite large I'm sure, and I think I would prefer to have those
rulebases separate.

Perhaps there's a future solution in that statement -- perhaps someday
other public BL systems might be automatically incorporated in to SNF
readable distributions -- though with the exception of URI based
systems I think DNS distribution mechanisms are probably the best
choice.

I'll have to keep thinking about this.

Thanks!
_M




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Reply via email to