We are using Imail/Declude and I have seen this in several messages too. A part of the header is showing up in the message usually as the last part of the body content.
I will see if I can find some and send it. Heimir Jim Matuska wrote: > Yes, something is going on weird in Mdaemon. The strange thing is I > got both copies of your message, the one to me direct and the one to > the sniffer list. The strange thing is the one Pete sent to the list > I had to pull out of the bad message directory as it did not make it > to me. I'm not sure what the difference is. > > I also found I get the following errors in the Mdaemon log for these > messages: > > Fri 2005-08-19 11:10:33: Error parsing > <C:\MDaemon\Queues\Local\pd50000017032.msg> > Fri 2005-08-19 11:10:33: Message moved to > <c:\mdaemon\queues\bad\pd50000001091.msg> > > Jim Matuska Jr. > Computer Tech2, CCNA > Nez Perce Tribe > Information Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alberto Santoni" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <sniffer@SortMonster.com> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 11:15 AM > Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after > switching to Mdaemon > > > Hello > > I received messages of this kind me too. Then I must understand that the > cause is MDaemon and not iMail? > > Alberto > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Pete McNeil > Sent: venerdì 19 agosto 2005 20.03 > To: Jim Matuska > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after > switching > to Mdaemon > > On Friday, August 19, 2005, 12:53:39 PM, Jim wrote: > > JM> Pete, > JM> The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon, so far so > > I was almost hoping this was a switch to a new version of MDaemon > since this seems to be a new phenomena. Thanks for the data! > > JM> good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer > JM> integration much better than the declude integration. > > We're hoping to go this route with other systems too-- but change is > slow. The MDaemon folks are very aggressive in seeking new > improvements :-) > > <snip/> > > JM> Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck > JM> in the bad message queue but I recieved my original post to the > JM> list. Any thoughts? Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if > JM> you can so I don't have to read the response from my bad message > JM> queue when it comes from the list. > > Can you check the headers for the SNF results and any other tests > which might have cause the message to get captured? There's something > there that needs to be fixed. > > Thanks, > > _M > > > > This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For > information and > (un)subscription instructions go to > http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html > > > > > > > This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For > information and (un)subscription instructions go to > http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html > > This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
