On Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 4:58:35 PM, Harry wrote: HV> HV> HV> at the moment I run the following test in declude HV> HV> SNIFFER external nonzero HV> "D:\IMail\Declude\sniffer\xxxxxxxxxx.exe xxxxxxxxxxxx persistent" 13 0 HV>
THIS IS WRONG! You should not have the persistent command line option in your Declude configuration. You should only run your persistent instance outside of Declude. Run only peer instances (without the persistent keyword) from inside Declude. HV> I have seen a more detailed setup before and am interested in HV> doing that here also. Is there a comprehensive list somewhere along with instructions? HV> HV> If I want to apply separate weighting using only some of the HV> detailed test and then a catchall test for the rest, is that possible? Sure. The easiest way I know of is to leave your existing line in place and then add an additional test (using SNF) that adjusts the specific result code you want to tune. For example, if you wanted to back down group 63 you might add a line: SNF63 external 63 "D:\IMail\Declude\sniffer\xxxxxxxxxx.exe xxxxxxxxxxxx" -3 0 Declude will recognize that the command line is identical and will simply reuse the result with the new test name "SNF63" instead of running SNF again. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
