On Thursday, March 9, 2006, 8:48:43 AM, Nick wrote: NH> Hi Pete -
NH> Pete McNeil wrote: >>Hello Sniffer Folks, >> >> The F001 Rule Bot has been adjusted. >> NH> Is it possible for you to recommend a percentage of accuracy or maybe NH> better stated a percentage of delete weight for each rule? I am NH> wondering which rules you feel are the weakest and which are the NH> strongest. I am well aware 'mileage may vary' but just your thoughts on NH> reliability would be insightful. Currently the rules I trust the most NH> are at 90% of my hold weight which overall is less than 50% of my delete NH> weight. Rules that I trust the least like general and experimental are NH> at ~ 40% of my hold weight. It's a bit too early to know about the reliability of F001. So far the number of false positives has fallen quite sharply and continues to fall from what I can see. In addition, the new constraints on F001 will cause it to be much more reliable still (w/ regard to FPs). I would say that the most conservative weight for symbol 63 would be to weight it at the same weight as your average IP based blacklist. A more moderate position might have the lowest rated SNF tests at about 70% of your hold weight (this seems to be fairly common). Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
