Pete,
In light of current and prolonged issues, this seems like a good and
safe tactic. I would appreciate it however if maybe you could place the
rules in another result code since this result code is not as accurate
as some others are and some of us weight it lower than others.
Thanks,
Matt
Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello Sniffer Folks,
Rulebot F002 has been placed online.
This rulebot captures and creates geocities web links from the
"chatty" campaigns. This is largely a time saver for us humans... we
will focus our attention more on abstracts for these campaigns now
that F002 will be capturing the raw links.
Rules from F002 will produce a 60 result code (Ungrouped).
The engine is following a standard protocol that we have used for
months. I expect no false positives from this one.
Thanks,
_M
Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
Chief SortMonster (www.sortmonster.com)
Chief Scientist (www.armresearch.com)
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html