What's your hold weight? If spam is only
failing SPF and nothing else, then the message doesn't get held, so you don't
see it.
Also, I do not recommend negative weighting
SPFPASS. Spammers have SPF records, too, so you're giving them an
opportunity to exploit it.
Lastly, I think you may be confused on your SPF
records. They should not have the "name" portion. There is only one
SPF record per domain.
So, for computerhouse.com, your SPF record should
simply be
v=spf1 mx -all
which tells it your MX is allowed to send mail for
your domain (the "mx" part) , but all others should fail ( the "-all"
part).
Please keep related communication on the list
for others' benefit as well.
Darin. ----- Original Message -----
From: Computer
House Support
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:40 PM
Subject: SPF Hi Darin,
Thanks for your offer to help. I am E-mailing you
off-list.
We do use Declude. The entry in our
$default$.junkmail file looks like this:
SPFFAIL WARN
SPFPASS WARN SPFUNKNOWN WARN However, I have never seen an "SPF Failure" in the
header of a spam mail.
Global.cfg:
SPFFAIL spf fail x 3 0
SPFPASS spf pass x -1 0 Our SPF Record looks like this:
computerhouse.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 mx
mx:mail.computerhouse.com"
mail.computerhouse.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" Your insight is appreciated.
Michael Stein
Computer House
|
- Re: [sniffer]SPF Darin Cox
- Re: [sniffer]SPF Computer House Support
- Re: [sniffer]SPF Darin Cox