Hello Serge, Tuesday, December 12, 2006, 2:22:27 PM, you wrote:
> We started using tests for the different sniffer categories recently and are > finding that snifferwhitelist is very innacurate > ot is substracting wheight from more real spam than it does of non-spam > messages > should we just drop it ? what are you guys doing about this ? Note that in the default rulebase setup, there is no such thing (really) as a sniffer whitelist rule group. We do have some (very few highly secret) global white rules - but they are coded to produce a zero result. You should consider a zero result NOT to indicate a whitelist hit, but rather the absence of a black-rule hit. On some systems that have customized rulebases, local white rules _may_ be coded to a special result code so they can be extracted from the results, but this is not usually the case. Hope this helps, Thanks, _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
