Re: domain keys: I was looking at that in some older forum posts, and
from what I could tell it only did inbound authentication, not outbound
signing.  But apparently it does DK both ways now.  Sorry!  

 

I like SmarterMail, but as Matt says it's not perfect.  Their support is
definitely lacking, even though it's totally paid now, and they have a
very rapid development cycle (which is not a bad thing), but they really
like to stick it to folks who bought an old version just prior to the
release of a new version by making them pay full upgrade price.  Not
very customer friendly.  The CEO seems to be totally missing that point
and interacts with customers in public forums using a very arrogant
tone. OTOH, they allow service providers to hand out free 50 domain /
250 user licenses to any of their customers, in the hops that the
customer will need to upgrade to a larger edition.  This is good for the
service provider and very good for folks who fit into the "free" license
size.

 

And yes, ME really is a dog -  poor performance, poor code, poor overall
implementation

 

-Jay

 

________________________________

From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 3:06 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Integration with Mailenable

 

There is in fact a Domain Keys plug-in for SmarterMail listed on their
downloads page:

    http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/DL/v4.aspx

Personally I'm not a fan of any present sender identification
implementation.  Both SPF and Domain Keys are primarily associated with
spam by volume, and SPF can at cause one's customers issues when they do
things like use alternative SMTP servers or find themselves behind an
SMTP proxy at a hotel or T-Mobile HotSpot...but I digress.

I think that both IMail and SmarterMail are decent products, but neither
one of them is perfect.  SmarterMail certainly has a lower cost of
entry.  I would trust Jay's experience with MailEnable considering his
extensive experience.

Matt



Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC wrote: 

Hi Phil -
 
Good question.  We integrate Sniffer into SmarterMail via Declude.
However, SmarterMail does have the capability to run a program against a
message before it is delivered.  We have some customers that use a batch
file to call f-prot and get virus scanning integrated into their mail
server on the cheap.  I believe it would likely be possible to make use
of the same functionality to call Sniffer directly, and thus avoid
having to purchase Declude.  I have just never had a need to attempt
this.
 
As for domain keys, I don't believe so.  However, you can setup
SPFyou're your domains simply by adding the appropriate DNS records to
said domains zone files.
 
-Jay
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phillip Cohen
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 12:01 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Integration with Mailenable
 
 
Jay,
 
Thanks for the heads up on Mailenable. I took a look at SmarterMail 
and it looks pretty good. How does it interface with Message Sniffer 
or does it require and external gateway such as EWall? How has 
support been with it and how have they been as far as updates. Also 
does it have "domain keys" capability and SPF support for sending 
mail to yahoo.com etc...
 
Thanks,
 
Phil
 
 
At 07:26 PM 3/15/2007, you wrote:
  

        Stay Away From MailEnable.
         
        There are so many exploits out there for MailEnable, and there
are more
        exploits found monthly, if not weekly.  At one particular
interval,
        MailEnable had to re-release the same patch several times in the
*same*
        week because it kept on not actually fixing the root of the
issue.  If
        you run MailEnable, odds are that you will end up exploited,
even if
            

you
  

        stay on the of the patches.
         
        On top of that, MailEnable is just simply a CPU and IO hog, much
more
            

so
  

        than other other mail server I have ever seen.  By default, they
use
        entirely text based configuration files, which on occasion get
            

truncated
  

        to zero during periods of high activity on the server.
         
        In the past year, we have assisted our customers move 20,000+
mailboxes
        away from MailEnable, mostly all to SmarterMail.  Do not waste
your
            

time
  

        and money with MailEnable.
         
        -Jay
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
        Behalf Of Phillip Cohen
        Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:22 PM
        To: Message Sniffer Community
        Subject: [sniffer] Integration with Mailenable
         
         
        We are finally going to replace our old Vopmail server. Looking
at
        Mailenable Enterprise. Will Sortmonster work with that program?
Is
        anyone using Mailenable? If so how is it and if it works with
        Sortmonster how did you use them together.
         
        THanks,
         
        Phil
         
         
        #############################################################
        This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
          the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>
<mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com> .
        To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
            

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  

        To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        Send administrative queries to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
         
         
         
        #############################################################
        This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
          the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>
<mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com> .
        To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
            

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  

        To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        Send administrative queries to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
            

 
 
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>
<mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com> .
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 
 
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>
<mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com> .
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 
 
  

Reply via email to