Hello Andrew, Friday, February 22, 2008, 4:37:18 AM, you wrote:
<snip/> > If you were a *nix shop, you would still lean towards having a dedicated > gateway server (or many) and your CPU hog would be spamassassin, which > you would run in a client/server model to shift the CPU usage to other > boxes. Of course, SNF also can plug into SA. However SNF tends to be much leaner than SA with comparable (or even slightly better) capture rates. You may want to run SNF in front of SA to get rid of most of the junk and rapidly inform local blocking lists and gray-listing mechanisms. The combination of SA & SNF is superior to either on it's own if you have the technical resources. _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
