Thanks for the info.  Is there any diagnostic information available when a
gbudb sync occurs?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Pete McNeil
<madscient...@armresearch.com>wrote:

> Richard Stupek wrote:
>
>> A question on GBUDB utilization.  I show a current utilization of 95%
>> (from the log file) which I assume means the amount of memory used from what
>> is set aside for gbudb entries.  Is that correct?
>>
> Yes.
>
>>  What happens when more entries are added?  Does the GBUdb grow or does it
>> get pruned out?
>>
> Both. When more space is needed the ram allocated to GBUdb will grow to
> accommodate the need. This should happen infrequently. When entries are no
> longer active they are dropped to make room for additional entries. In
> practice the GBUdb data size stabilizes quickly and then doesn't change
> much.
>
> Once per day or as otherwise specified by GBUdb condensation triggers the
> GBUdb data will be condensed. This means that all of the good and bad event
> counts are divided in half. This has the effect of retaining the ratios
> (probability of spam) while reducing the event counts (confidence figure).
> Any ugly entries that drop to zero are dropped from the system (forgotten).
> The remaining live entries are placed in a new GBUdb and the old one is
> thrown away. If the GBUdb size can shrink during a condensation run then it
> will.
>
>>  Will gbudb XCI commands (like <bad>) show up in a log file?
>>
> No. These are administrative entries so they don't get reported in scan
> activity. We may change this later but at present there are no requests for
> it.
>
> Best,
>
>
> _M
>
>
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com>
> Send administrative queries to  <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>
>
>

Reply via email to