OK, the new version fixes the "spamassassin -D --lint" warnings, but it
still seems to be operating incorrectly.  SNF4SA seems to be hitting on
everything and I've still got the error in the log about timing out, but
only once when spamd started.  Otherwise, everything still seems to be
getting a 1 weight for SNF4SA.

About the command, the executables for SNFClient snd SNFServer compiled
with .exe extensions by default, and their location
(/var/spool/snfilter) isn't in the path, so I had to enter the following
command to get any response:

# /var/spool/snfilter/SNFClient.exe -status.second

<!-- Status Report -->
<stats nodeid='oknrwfg5' basetime='20090513210522' elapsed='1002'
class='second'>
        <version>
                <engine>SNFMulti Engine Version 3.0 Build: Aug  4 2008
11:29:01</engine>
                <platform>SNF Server Version 3.0.1 Build: Aug  4 2008
11:29:21</platform>
        </version>
        <timers>
                <run started='20090513205211' elapsed='792'/>
                <sync latest='20090513210447' elapsed='36'/>
                <save latest='20080805123428' elapsed='24309055'/>
                <condense latest='19700101000000' elapsed='1242248723'/>
        </timers>
        <gbudb>
                <size bytes='8388608'/>
                <records count='114'/>
                <utilization percent='0.57373'/>
        </gbudb>
        <counters>
        </counters>
        <rates>
                <m s='0' m='12.7023' h='246.818' d='5923.64'/>
                <s s='0' m='7.25843' h='143.717' d='3449.21'/>
                <h s='0' m='5.44382' h='103.101' d='2474.43'/>
                <w s='0' m='0' h='0' d='0'/>
                <c s='0' m='0' h='0' d='0'/>
                <b s='0' m='0' h='0' d='0'/>
                <t s='0' m='0' h='0' d='0'/>
                <a s='0' m='0' h='0' d='0'/>
                <r s='0' m='0' h='0' d='0'/>
        </rates>
        <results>
        </results>
        <rules>
                <rulebase utc='20090507193558'/>
                <active utc='20090507193558'/>
                <update ready='yes' utc='20090513194922'/>
                <latest rule='2447774'/>
        </rules>
        <panics>
        </panics>
</stats>


It also looks like the auto-rulebase updating isn't working either, but
I'll worry about that separately.

Dan Horne
TAIS
Director of Operations
www.taisweb.net
supp...@taisweb.net 
828.252.TAIS (8247)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of
> Pete McNeil
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:45 PM
> To: Message Sniffer Community
> Subject: [sniffer] Re: SNF4SA - Message Sniffer Antispam Plugin for
> SpamAssassin
> 
> Dan Horne wrote:
> > Oh, yeah, I should also include this from the mail logs.  It doesn't
> > look like SNF4SA is being run successfully, but it still results in
a SA
> > weight of 1 rather than the sa_score configured:
> >
> 
> Interesting -- I wonder why snf4sa did not connect with SNFServer ---
Am
> I correct that the later reference SNIFFER=6 indicates that a
different
> SNF implementation was successful?
> 
> When you run SNFClient -status.second do you get XML status data?
> 
> In any case-- if the plugin was unable to connect it should return a
> zero score
> 
> I'm passing this on to Alban.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> _M
> 
> 
> Remainder for reference...
> 
> > May 13 16:04:32 mail amavis[1051]: (01051-07) _WARN: rules: failed
to
> > run SNF4SA test, skipping:\n\t(Snf4sa: Timeout waiting for response
from
> > SNFServer at /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/snf4sa.pm line
721.\n)\n
> > May 13 16:04:33 mail amavis[1051]: (01051-07) spam_scan:
score=25.451
> > autolearn=disabled
> >
tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37,DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,FB_INDEPEND_RWD=3.599,FH_FRO
> >
M_CASH=2.996,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=1.052,HTML_TAG_BAL
> >
ANCE_BODY=0.807,MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,RAZOR2_C
> >
F_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5,RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5,SNF
> > 4SA=1,SNIFFER=6,SPF_FAIL=0.992,URIBL_BLACK=1.961]
> > May 13 16:04:34 mail amavis[1051]: (01051-07) SPAM,
> > <bounce-muxikqvilwlv...@topspotbrands.com> ->
> > <dwil...@wilcoxtravel.com>, Yes, score=25.451 tag=-999 tag2=6 kill=6
> > tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, FB_INDEPEND_RWD=3.599,
> > FH_FROM_CASH=2.996, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=1.052,
> > HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY=0.807, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672,
> > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5,
> > RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, SNF4SA=1,
SNIFFER=6,
> > SPF_FAIL=0.992, URIBL_BLACK=1.961], autolearn=disabled
> >
> 
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
<sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com>
> Send administrative queries to  <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>



#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com>
Send administrative queries to  <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>

Reply via email to