Hi Pete, Thanks.
Yes, we did submit a report, but it appears the rule used the wrong set of message headers and filtered our customer instead of the spam they were reporting. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete McNeil" <[email protected]> To: "Message Sniffer Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:25 PM Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 3059196 On 4/6/2010 12:48 PM, Darin Cox wrote: > Hi Pete, > > We've put a RulePanic in for 3059196, as we're getting a lot of FPs on it. > > Can you look at this rule, and/or let me know what it is? > The rule is a bit.ly link found in spamtraps. The link leads to a specific constant-contact list sign-up page. Message 41510774 was the source -- apparently submitted as spam by your system. I will contact you off list with that information. I have excluded the rule. _M ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. This list is for discussing Message Sniffer, Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics. For More information see http://www.armresearch.com To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> Send administrative queries to <[email protected]> ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. This list is for discussing Message Sniffer, Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics. For More information see http://www.armresearch.com To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> Send administrative queries to <[email protected]>
