Hi, Jochen Katz wrote: > >> The current implementation of snmp4j does not support resynchronization in >> this case; my question is: should it? > > No. If you have a device that changes its engine id, this can and should > be solved by the application. The MPv3 offers functions to add, get and > remove known engine ids, same for the USM. >
I agree with Jochen. The reason for not doing an auto rediscovery is security! If you would do so, a man-in-middle attack would be very easy! Best regards, Frank -- AGENT++ http://www.agentpp.com http://www.snmp4j.com http://www.mibexplorer.com http://www.mibdesigner.com _______________________________________________ SNMP4J mailing list [email protected] http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
