Yulia, With the current 1.10, you will have to implement your own TcpTransportMapping. I will provide hooks (Factory interface) for the next release to allow socket injection.
Best regards, Frank Yulia Kozarevska wrote: > Dear all, > I'm trying to implement snmp protocol support for a complex client-server > application using snmp4j. I need to create a transport on pre-existing > socket. Concerning DefaultUdpTransportMapping class it seems to be easy. I > create a new XXXUdpTransportMapping extending DefaultUdpTransportMapping and > define a different constructor, creating the socket in a required way: > socket = new > XXXSocketFactory().createDatagramSocket(udpAddress.getInetAddress() > , udpAddress.getPort()); > > But how to make XXXTcpTransportMapping extending DefaultTcpTransportMapping > to behave similarly (work on already existing socket)? > Thank you very much in advance. > Best regards, > Julia > > _______________________________________________ > SNMP4J mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j -- AGENT++ http://www.agentpp.com http://www.snmp4j.com http://www.mibexplorer.com http://www.mibdesigner.com _______________________________________________ SNMP4J mailing list [email protected] http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
