Hi Simon, simon sew wrote: > Hi there, > Would like to ask a few quick questions. Sorry for my broken english. > > 1st) I would like to send a SNMP GET to a device. Instead of sending the > response back to the original port (Think it's 161). Can I change the port > no? Say port 199? If yes, how can I implement this?
You can, although this would violate the SNMP standard, but I think you know that already ;-) Just set a different target address for the response, than you got as peer address with the request. > 2nd) Is it possible to have something like this. > Say I have 1 class to send SNMP GET (port 161) and 1 class purely to receive > the trap (SNMP GET response - port 162). A RESPONSE PDU is not a TRAP PDU. Regards, Frank > I would like to use the answer from 1st question to implement this if > possible. I guess it would run into port binding exception. > Have anyone facing similiar issues like mine. Are you able to solve it? > > Thank you. > > > Regards, > Simon > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they > e-mail you. > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:ms-my:SI_SB_3:092010 > _______________________________________________ > SNMP4J mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j -- AGENT++ http://www.agentpp.com http://www.snmp4j.com http://www.mibexplorer.com http://www.mibdesigner.com _______________________________________________ SNMP4J mailing list [email protected] http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
