I have seen the problem. I changed this part of code in
NotificationOriginatorImpl line 173:
Address address = ((SnmpTargetAddrEntryRow)addr).getAddress();
to this:
Address address = GenericAddress.parse("udp:255.255.255.255/162");
I'm now receiving traps on PC 2.
My questions are:
1. Is this the correct approach? That is, I have to specify on the agent
side the ip address of the monitor ip address? My idea is you deploy the
agent and the agent doesn't care who monitors it. With this approach, the
agent has to know who monitors it.
2. I haven't looked deeper but where is the address of this code
"((SnmpTargetAddrEntryRow)addr).getAddress()" being stored 'cause as I see
it, it always returns 127.0.0.1 which is only useful for development and not
for production?
Thanks and best regards,
Allan
-----Original Message-----
From: snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] On
Behalf Of Ver Allan N. Sumabat
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 7:13 PM
To: 'Kazantsev, Andrey V.'
Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Trap Messages using SampleAgent from the network not
working
This is the part I'm not sure I understand. Correct me if I'm wrong, my
understanding is let's say PC 1 (agent) generates a trap. The trap is caused
by let's say a hardware malfunction. Shouldn't the trap message originate
from PC 1 and not PC 2 because PC 1 has the failing hardware and the agent
should simply report it to PC 2? That is, PC 2 is the trap receiver
listening on port 162?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kazantsev, Andrey V. [mailto:kazant...@axmor.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 6:52 PM
To: Ver Allan N. Sumabat
Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: RE: [SNMP4J] Trap Messages using SampleAgent from the network not
working
Are you sure that snmp agent listens on address that is accessible for snmp
monitor? I.e., PC 1 (agent) address is 192.168.1.1 and PC 2 (monitor)
address is 192.168.1.2. Snmp agent should listen on 192.168.1.1:161, while
snmp monitor should send notifications to 192.168.1.1:161 (using its
192.168.1.2 interface).
If this is ok - check network connection between these two PCs, maybe there
is a firewall on PC 1 that is blocking 161 port?
If you work on linux, you can also use tcpdump to see what is going on
network.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ver Allan N. Sumabat [mailto:allan.suma...@aatitechnologies.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 17:44
To: Kazantsev, Andrey V.
Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: RE: [SNMP4J] Trap Messages using SampleAgent from the network not
working
The thing is the traps and informs are received locally meaning on
127.0.0.1. When I use another machine to receive the traps, I cannot receive
them. Let me elaborate further:
Case 1:
PC 1 - has snmp agent (SampleAgent from snmp4j source), has snmp monitor
-----------------------
result: traps are received by PC 1.
Case 2:
PC 1 - has snmp agent (snmp4j agent)
PC 2 - has snmp monitor
-----------------------
Result: no traps received by PC 2
Btw, I didn't change anything in the SampleAgent source to make it run.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kazantsev, Andrey V. [mailto:kazant...@axmor.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:30 PM
To: Ver Allan N. Sumabat
Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: RE: [SNMP4J] Trap Messages using SampleAgent from the network not
working
Hi,
By default traps and informs use port 162, maybe be this is the cause of
problem?
-----Original Message-----
From: snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] On
Behalf Of Ver Allan N. Sumabat
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 16:09
To: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: [SNMP4J] Trap Messages using SampleAgent from the network not
working
Hi List,
I'm having a problem trying to get trap messages over the network using the
SampleAgent class. I tried starting it with the following argument:
udp:127.0.0.1/161
Using the iReasoning MIBBrowser personal edition, I can receive trap
messages locally. When I use another pc as snmp monitor, I could no longer
receive those trap messages.
I tried changing the program argument to udp:192.168.x.x/161 which is the ip
address of the pc running the agent but still same result.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Allan
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
