Frank,
I have further ran through the code execution line by line and the
identified where the problem occurs - it is in VacmMIB.java class, in the
method getGroupName(...)
private OctetString getGroupName(OctetString securityName,
int securityModel) {
OID index = new OID();
index.append(securityModel);
index.append(securityName.toSubIndex(false));
MOTableRow row = vacmSecurityToGroupTableModel.getRow(index);
if (row != null) {
OctetString groupName = (OctetString) row.getValue(idxVacmGroupName);
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Found group name '"+groupName+"' for secName '"+
securityName+"' and secModel "+securityModel);
}
return groupName;
}
return null;
}:
For the private community, the call " MOTableRow row =
vacmSecurityToGroupTableModel.getRow(index);" returns a null "row", which
then propagates the error in a cascade. I tried to trace back this problem
through may function calls and it seems that the context is set correctly (I
created two contexts - one for public community and one for private
community), and when the call is made during the requested SET operation,
the context is found correctly to be "private" but the views associated with
the context cannot be found, even though they have been created correctly
during the initialization process and placed in the respective locations
into MIBs.
I am going back in circles trying to figure out which of the initialization
configurations are incorrect. I already tried to create a single default
context set to "", single context set to "public" and also create two
separate contexts "public" and "private" and the net outcome is the same. It
is my understanding that either of these should work fine if the binding was
done correctly.
The latest configuration with two explicit contexts is shown below for
reference. I did read through all the respective references you pointed me
to, and I cannot still move this forward. Yes, I understand I should
probably get a paid support for this problem, but I cannot afford to buy a
support license for a year for this problem to be solved. If there was an
option of pay-per-problem, I would consider it (I am that desperate) but
shelling out big money for year's support for a school project that ends
this semester is a big of an overkill for me. Hope you understand.
====================================== addCommunities >>>>>>
protected void addCommunities(SnmpCommunityMIB communityMIB)
{
// ==== default configuration ====
Variable[] com2sec1 = new Variable[]
{
new OctetString("public"), // community name
new OctetString("cpublic"), // security name
getAgent().getContextEngineID(), // local engine ID
new OctetString("public"), // default context name
new OctetString(), // transport tag
new Integer32(StorageType.nonVolatile), // storage
type
new Integer32(RowStatus.active) // row status
};
MOTableRow row1 =
communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().createRow(new
OctetString("public2public").toSubIndex(true), com2sec1);
communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().addRow(row1);
// ==== extended configuration ====
Variable[] com2sec2 = new Variable[]
{
new OctetString("private"),
new OctetString("cprivate"), // security name
getAgent().getContextEngineID(), // local engine ID
new OctetString("private"), // default context name
new OctetString(), // transport tag
new Integer32(StorageType.nonVolatile), // storage
type
new Integer32(RowStatus.active) // row status
};
MOTableRow row2 =
communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().createRow(new
OctetString("private2private").toSubIndex(true), com2sec2);
communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().addRow(row2);
}
====================================== addViews >>>>>>
protected void addViews(VacmMIB vacm)
{
vacm.addGroup(
SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_ANY,
new OctetString("cpublic"),
new OctetString("v1v2group_public"),
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
vacm.addGroup(
SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_ANY,
new OctetString("cprivate"),
new OctetString("v1v2group_private"),
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
vacm.addAccess(
new OctetString("v1v2group_public"),
new OctetString("public"),
SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_ANY,
SecurityLevel.NOAUTH_NOPRIV,
MutableVACM.VACM_MATCH_EXACT,
new OctetString("fullReadView"),
new OctetString("fullWriteView"),
new OctetString("fullNotifyView"),
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
vacm.addAccess(
new OctetString("v1v2group_private"),
new OctetString("private"),
SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_ANY,
SecurityLevel.NOAUTH_NOPRIV,
MutableVACM.VACM_MATCH_EXACT,
new OctetString("fullReadView"),
new OctetString("fullWriteView"),
new OctetString("fullNotifyView"),
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
vacm.addViewTreeFamily(
new OctetString("fullReadView"),
new OID(".1.3"),
new OctetString(),
VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
vacm.addViewTreeFamily(
new OctetString("fullWriteView"),
new OID(".1.3"),
new OctetString(),
VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
vacm.addViewTreeFamily(
new OctetString("fullNotifyView"),
new OID(".1.3"),
new OctetString(),
VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
StorageType.nonVolatile
);
}
Marek
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Fock [mailto:f...@agentpp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 02 April, 2013 5:42 PM
To: Marek Hajduczenia
Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] SET access to created managed objects
Marek,
You have mapped your views only to the default context, but you have mapped
the "private" community to the "private" context.
That will not work. Either map your "private" community to the default
context ("") or map all the views to the "private" context too.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 02.04.2013 23:39, schrieb Marek Hajduczenia:
> Frank,
>
> I tried to bind the "private" community to all views as follows
>
> protected void addViews(VacmMIB vacm)
> {
> vacm.addGroup(SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c, new
> OctetString("cpublic"), new OctetString("v1v2group"),
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addGroup(SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c, new
> OctetString("cprivate"), new OctetString("v1v2group"),
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
>
> vacm.addAccess(new OctetString("v1v2group"), new
> OctetString("public"), SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c,
> SecurityLevel.NOAUTH_NOPRIV, MutableVACM.VACM_MATCH_EXACT, new
> OctetString("fullReadViewPublic"), new
> OctetString("fullWriteViewPublic"),
> new OctetString("fullNotifyViewPublic"), StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addAccess(new OctetString("v1v2group"), new
> OctetString("private"), SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c,
> SecurityLevel.NOAUTH_NOPRIV, MutableVACM.VACM_MATCH_EXACT, new
> OctetString("fullReadViewPrivate"), new
> OctetString("fullWriteViewPrivate"),
> new OctetString("fullNotifyViewPrivate"), StorageType.nonVolatile);
>
> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullReadViewPublic"), new
> OID("1.3"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullWriteViewPublic"), new
> OID("1.3"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullNotifyViewPublic"), new
> OID("1.3"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullReadViewPrivate"), new
> OID("1.3.6.1.3.22"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullWriteViewPrivate"), new
> OID("1.3.6.1.3.22"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
> StorageType.nonVolatile);
> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullNotifyViewPrivate"), new
> OID("1.3.6.1.3.22"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
> StorageType.nonVolatile); }
>
> separating definitions of views for public and private communities,
> but it did not remove the problem.
>
> I also looked into the SnapshopAgent.java class, but definitions for
> V2c included there are very similar to what I am doing so I must be
> missing something obvious here ...
>
> Thanks for the patience
>
> Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Fock [mailto:f...@agentpp.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 02 April, 2013 10:21 PM
> To: Marek Hajduczenia
> Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org
> Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] SET access to created managed objects
>
> Hi Marek,
>
> Then it the "private" context which you did not bound to the VACM view
> "fullReadView".
>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
> Am 02.04.2013 23:11, schrieb Marek Hajduczenia:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> The default configuration covers the whole 1.3 tree with
>> "fullReadView", which is fine enough. If I understand correctly, that
>> makes the whole tree in 1.3 branch accessible for reading ...
>>
>> === vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullReadView"), new
>> OID("1.3"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
>> StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>
>> Now, I added the following statement as well:
>>
>> === vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new OctetString("fullWriteView"), new
>> OID("1.3.6.1.3.22"), new OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded,
>> StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>
>> which if I understand the syntax correctly, should add the "
> fullWriteView"
>> access to the whole experimental root that I am using. I am not sure
>> how the debug information helps me in this case, since it points out
>> that
> "private"
>> context is found (23705 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_0.0.0.0/161]
>> DEBUG org.snmp4j.agent.mo.snmp.SnmpCommunityMIB - Looking up
>> coexistence info for
>> 'private') and then the request was created successfully. The only
>> line that causes some concerns is the following:
>>
>> 77558 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_0.0.0.0/161] DEBUG
>> org.snmp4j.agent.request.SnmpRequest - SnmpSubRequests initialized:
>>
>
[org.snmp4j.agent.request.SnmpRequest$SnmpSubRequest[scope=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> DefaultMOContextScope[context=private,lowerBound=1.3.6.1.3.22.2.10.1,
>> l
>> owerIn
>>
>
cluded=true,upperBound=1.3.6.1.3.22.2.10.1,upperIncluded=true],vb=1.3.6.1.3.
>> 22.2.10.1 =
>> 12,status=org.snmp4j.agent.request.RequestStatus@6d7300f9,query=null,
>> i
>> ndex=0
>> ,targetMO=null]]
>>
>> where the targetMO is marked as null.
>>
>> I also examined how 5 test scalar objects are created
>>
>> 179 [main] INFO org.snmp4j.agent.DefaultMOServer - Registered MO
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.1.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=Marek-HP,volatile=false] in default
>> context with scope
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.1.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=Marek-HP,volatile=false]
>> 179 [main] INFO org.snmp4j.agent.DefaultMOServer - Registered MO
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.2.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=C:\Musicas,volatile=false] in default
>> context with scope
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.2.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=C:\Musicas,volatile=false]
>> 180 [main] INFO org.snmp4j.agent.DefaultMOServer - Registered MO
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.3.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=MediaMonkey,volatile=false] in default
>> context with scope
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.3.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=MediaMonkey,volatile=false]
>> 180 [main] INFO org.snmp4j.agent.DefaultMOServer - Registered MO
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.4.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=0,volatile=false] in default context
>> with scope
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.4.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@4a05fd83,value=0,volatile=false]
>> 180 [main] INFO org.snmp4j.agent.DefaultMOServer - Registered MO
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@674e5e21,value=15,volatile=false] in default context
>> with scope
>>
>
org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOScalar[oid=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0,access=org.snmp4j.agent.
>> mo.MOAccessImpl@674e5e21,value=15,volatile=false]
>>
>> Objects with OID = 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.1.0, 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.2.0,
>> 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.3.0, and 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.4.0 are created as read-only,
>> and
>> 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0 is created as read-write, and that is visible in
>> the difference in the access=org.snmp4j.agent.mo.MOAccessImpl@
statements.
>> However, how to combine that together, is not clear to me ... sorry
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org [mailto:snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org]
>> On Behalf Of Frank Fock
>> Sent: Tuesday, 02 April, 2013 8:50 PM
>> To: snmp4j@agentpp.org
>> Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] SET access to created managed objects
>>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> You have to setup the VACM properly in order to allow access to the
>> OID/subtree you are requesting. The default VACM configuration does
>> not include the "experimental" sub-tree IMHO.
>>
>> The log output gives you more detailed hints.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Frank
>>
>> Am 02.04.2013 11:13, schrieb Marek Hajduczenia:
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I create a very simple scalar in my agent:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OID oidTest = new OID("1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0");
>>>
>>> MOScalar sysScalarTest = new MOScalar(oidTest,
>>> MOAccessImpl.ACCESS_READ_WRITE, new Integer32(15));
>>>
>>> server.registerManagedObject(sysScalarTest);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and then would like to change its value remotely using the MIB
>>> browser. What I get back on the debug in Eclipse is the "Error
>> 'Authorization error'
>>> generated at: 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0 = 123" preceded by debug
>>> information about the message exchange and status exchange between
>>> agent and MIB
>> browser.
>>> Everything seems fine, i.e., "private" community is found, request
>>> with the private scope was created and proper object was found.
>>> However, when time to change came around, no change was done.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ===========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 20353 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.transport.DefaultUdpTransportMapping - Received message
>>> from
>>> localhost/127.0.0.1/56019 with length 45:
>>> 30:2b:02:01:01:04:07:70:72:69:76:61:74:65:a3:1d:02:04:5a:ad:24:55:02:
>>> 0
>>> 1:00:0 2:01:00:30:0f:30:0d:06:08:2b:06:01:03:16:01:05:00:02:01:7b
>>>
>>> 20354 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.Snmp - Fire process PDU event:
>>> CommandResponderEvent[securityModel=2,
>>> securityLevel=1, maxSizeResponsePDU=65535,
>>> pduHandle=PduHandle[1521296469],
>>> stateReference=StateReference[msgID=0,pduHandle=PduHandle[1521296469
>>> ]
>>> ,
>>> securi
>>> tyEngineID=null,securityModel=null,securityName=private,securityLeve
>>> l = 1,cont extEngineID=null,contextName=null,retryMsgIDs=null],
>>> pdu=SET[requestID=1521296469, errorStatus=Success(0), errorIndex=0,
>>> VBS[1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0 = 123]], messageProcessingModel=1,
>>> securityName=private, processed=false, peerAddress=127.0.0.1/56019,
>>> transportMapping=org.snmp4j.transport.DefaultUdpTransportMapping@36c
>>> 8
>>> e
>>> 545,
>>> tmStateReference=null]
>>>
>>> 20354 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.mo.snmp.SnmpCommunityMIB - Looking up coexistence
>>> info for 'private'
>>>
>>> 20355 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.mo.snmp.SnmpCommunityMIB - Found coexistence info
>>> for
>>>
>
'private'=CoexistenceInfo[securityName=cprivate,contextEngineID=80:00:13:70:
>>> 01:c0:a8:01:04,contextName=private,transportTag=]
>>>
>>> 20356 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.mo.snmp.SnmpCommunityMIB - Address 127.0.0.1/56019
>>> passes filter, because source address filtering is disabled
>>>
>>> 20356 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.request.SnmpRequest - Created subrequest 0 with
>>> scope
>
org.snmp4j.agent.DefaultMOContextScope[context=private,lowerBound=1.3.6.1.3.
>>> 22.1.5.0,lowerIncluded=true,upperBound=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0,upperInclu
>>> d
>>> e
>>> d=true
>>> ] from 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0 = 123
>>>
>>> 20356 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.request.SnmpRequest - SnmpSubRequests initialized:
>>>
>
[org.snmp4j.agent.request.SnmpRequest$SnmpSubRequest[scope=org.snmp4j.agent.
>>> DefaultMOContextScope[context=private,lowerBound=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0,
>>> l
>>> o
>>> werInc
>>> luded=true,upperBound=1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0,upperIncluded=true],vb=1.3.6.
>>> 1.3.22
>>> .1.5.0 =
>>> 123,status=org.snmp4j.agent.request.RequestStatus@6ceac619,query=nul
>>> l
>>> ,
>>> index=
>>> 0,targetMO=null]]
>>>
>>> 20358 [DefaultUDPTransportMapping_127.0.0.1/2001] DEBUG
>>> org.snmp4j.transport.DefaultUdpTransportMapping - Sending message
>>> to
>>> 127.0.0.1/56019 with length 45:
>>> 30:2b:02:01:01:04:07:70:72:69:76:61:74:65:a2:1d:02:04:5a:ad:24:55:02:
>>> 0
>>> 1:10:0 2:01:01:30:0f:30:0d:06:08:2b:06:01:03:16:01:05:00:02:01:7b
>>>
>>> java.lang.Exception: Error 'Authorization error' generated at:
>>> 1.3.6.1.3.22.1.5.0 = 123
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.request.SnmpRequest$SnmpSubRequest.requestStatusCha
>>> n
>>> g
>>> ed(Snm
>>> pRequest.java:617)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.request.RequestStatus.fireRequestStatusChanged(Requ
>>> e
>>> s
>>> tStatu
>>> s.java:89)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.request.RequestStatus.setErrorStatus(RequestStatus.
>>> j
>>> a
>>> va:52)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.CommandProcessor.setAuthorizationError(CommandProce
>>> s
>>> s
>>> or.jav
>>> a:499)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.CommandProcessor.processRequest(CommandProcessor.ja
>>> v
>>> a
>>> :378)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.CommandProcessor.dispatchCommand(CommandProcessor.j
>>> a
>>> v
>>> a:339)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.CommandProcessor$Command.run(CommandProcessor.java:
>>> 5
>>> 5
>>> 9)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.agent.CommandProcessor.processPdu(CommandProcessor.java:1
>>> 6
>>> 2
>>> )
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.MessageDispatcherImpl.fireProcessPdu(MessageDispatcherImpl.
>>> java:6
>>> 64)
>>>
>>> at
>>>
>
org.snmp4j.MessageDispatcherImpl.dispatchMessage(MessageDispatcherImpl.java:
>>> 297)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.MessageDispatcherImpl.processMessage(MessageDispatcherImpl.
>>> java:3
>>> 68)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.MessageDispatcherImpl.processMessage(MessageDispatcherImpl.
>>> java:3
>>> 28)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.transport.AbstractTransportMapping.fireProcessMessage(Abs
>>> t
>>> r
>>> actTra
>>> nsportMapping.java:76)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.snmp4j.transport.DefaultUdpTransportMapping$ListenThread.run(Def
>>> a
>>> u
>>> ltUdpT
>>> ransportMapping.java:378)
>>>
>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ===========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Definition of the "public" and "private" communities are as follows:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> protected void addCommunities(SnmpCommunityMIB
>>> communityMIB)
>>>
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>> Variable[] com2sec1 = new
>>> Variable[]
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString("public"),
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString("cpublic"), // security name
>>>
>>>
>>> getAgent().getContextEngineID(), // local engine ID
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString("public"), // default context name
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString(), // transport tag
>>>
>>> new
>>> Integer32(StorageType.nonVolatile), // storage type
>>>
>>> new
>>> Integer32(RowStatus.active) // row status
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Variable[] com2sec2 = new
>>> Variable[]
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString("private"),
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString("cprivate"), // security name
>>>
>>>
>>> getAgent().getContextEngineID(), // local engine ID
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString("private"), // default context name
>>>
>>> new
>>> OctetString(), // transport tag
>>>
>>> new
>>> Integer32(StorageType.nonVolatile), // storage type
>>>
>>> new
>>> Integer32(RowStatus.active) // row status
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MOTableRow row2 =
>>> communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().createRow(new
>>> OctetString("private").toSubIndex(true), com2sec2);
>>>
>>> MOTableRow row1 =
>>> communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().createRow(new
>>> OctetString("public").toSubIndex(true), com2sec1);
>>>
>>>
>>> communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().addRow(row2);
>>>
>>>
>>> communityMIB.getSnmpCommunityEntry().addRow(row1);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /**
>>>
>>> * Adds initial VACM configuration.
>>>
>>> */
>>>
>>> @Override
>>>
>>> protected void addViews(VacmMIB vacm)
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>>
>>> vacm.addGroup(SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c, new
>>> OctetString("cpublic"), new OctetString("v1v2group"),
>>> StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>>
>>>
>>> vacm.addGroup(SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c, new
>>> OctetString("cprivate"), new OctetString("v1v2group"),
>>> StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> vacm.addAccess(new
>>> OctetString("v1v2group"), new OctetString("public"),
>>> SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_ANY, SecurityLevel.NOAUTH_NOPRIV,
>>> MutableVACM.VACM_MATCH_EXACT, new OctetString("fullReadView"), new
>>> OctetString("fullWriteView"), new OctetString("fullNotifyView"),
>>> StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>>
>>> vacm.addAccess(new
>>> OctetString("v1v2group"), new OctetString("private"),
>>> SecurityModel.SECURITY_MODEL_SNMPv2c,
>>> SecurityLevel.NOAUTH_NOPRIV, MutableVACM.VACM_MATCH_EXACT, new
>>> OctetString("fullReadView"), new OctetString("fullWriteView"), new
>>> OctetString("fullNotifyView"), StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> // vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new
>>> OctetString("fullReadView"), new OID("1.3"), new OctetString(),
>>> VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded, StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>>
>>> vacm.addViewTreeFamily(new
>>> OctetString("fullWriteView"), new OID("1.3.6.1.3.22.2.10"), new
>>> OctetString(), VacmMIB.vacmViewIncluded, StorageType.nonVolatile);
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think all the areas where changes were needed, were added. The
>>> only suspicion that I have is that the default context for all newly
>>> created objects may be set to "public" rather than "private" and I
>>> have no clue right now where to change it and how to do it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any suggestions / hints?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marek
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SNMP4J mailing list
>>> SNMP4J@agentpp.org
>>> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>> --
>> ---
>> AGENT++
>> Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
>> 73257 Koengen, Germany
>> https://agentpp.com
>> Phone: +49 7024 8688230
>> Fax: +49 7024 8688231
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SNMP4J mailing list
>> SNMP4J@agentpp.org
>> http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>>
> --
> ---
> AGENT++
> Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
> 73257 Koengen, Germany
> https://agentpp.com
> Phone: +49 7024 8688230
> Fax: +49 7024 8688231
>
--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax: +49 7024 8688231
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
