Hi Hong,

If you want to follow the second option (which I do not recommend - because it is not what the standard
suggests), you will have to implement one or more MOSubtreeProxy instances.
Alternatively, you can also use the SNMP4J-PROXY-MIB and configure it appropriately.

For the first option, simply add (register) the SnmpProxyMib implementation to your agent and
configure it as described in the RFC for the SNMP-PROXY-MIB.

Best regards,
Frank

Am 14.10.2015 um 22:34 schrieb Daisy Chen:
Hi Frank,
Your reply is really appreciated.

I feel like the two ways are same, both has two SNMP Agent running, and need a Proxy in my SNMP4J Agent to access the Dell OpenManage server. Can you please tell me how to configure it?

If these two solutions are very different, I am thinking the second way you pointed out in your reply is better for me. I tried to find some example code, but can't find anywhere. I guess I need to add a proxy MIB, and create a proxy forwarder to handle the Dell OpenManage things.

In the SNMP4J-Agent, there is a Proxy MIB and Proxy Forwader been defined. I need to use these two classes to deal with Dell OpenManage MIB, am I right?



Spent a few days on reading the SNMP4J-Agent code, still confusing.

Your help will pull me out from the dark.

Thanks again,
Hong



On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Frank Fock <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Hong,

    You can use the SNMPv3 standard mechansim of using a proxy in the
    SNMP4J-Agent
    to access the Dell OpenManage SNMP server. This is simply a matter
    of configuration.

    Another approach would be to tweak it in that way, that you add
    proxy MIB objects
    in the SNMP4J-Agent that receive their data by issuing SNMP
    request to the Dell
    server. This would be more work and a matter of non-standard
    implementation
    and configuration, but that would be the only way to let the SNMP
    command sender
    that uses your agent to think all the data is provided by a single
    monolithic agent.

    In any case, timeout and performance handling could be an issue.
    Whereas the second
    option could provide caching options.

    Best regards,
    Frank


    Am 14.10.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Daisy Chen:

        I am wondering if there is a way to combine the SNMP4J-Agent
        and Dell
        OpenManage? I create a SNMP Agent based on SNMP4J-Agent to
        support my
        private MIB, and also want to access the Dell hardware/Memory
        resources
        through OpenManage. So that the IT SNMP manager only see one
        SNMP Agent (my
        SNMP4J Agent), but can operate all of MIBs (Private MIB and
        Dell resource
        MIB).


        Thanks,
        Hong
        _______________________________________________
        SNMP4J mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


-- ---
    AGENT++
    Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
    73257 Koengen, Germany
    https://agentpp.com
    Phone: +49 7024 8688230 <tel:%2B49%207024%208688230>
    Fax: +49 7024 8688231 <tel:%2B49%207024%208688231>

    _______________________________________________
    SNMP4J mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j



--
---
AGENT++
Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10
73257 Koengen, Germany
https://agentpp.com
Phone: +49 7024 8688230
Fax:   +49 7024 8688231

_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

Reply via email to