Can you share some code for Multi-threaded Get request? It will be gr8
help.Thanks.
On Thursday, 25 August 2016 11:42 AM, Frank Fock <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,Then your code is still not optimized.Best regards Frank
Am 24.08.2016 um 13:52 schrieb Akshat Kakkar <[email protected]>:
That worked as far as functionality is concerned, but timing didn't improved.
Its more or less same.
On Monday, 22 August 2016 7:26 PM, Frank Fock <[email protected]> wrote:
The API and the OS will handle that, no problem.
Am 22.08.2016 um 08:51 schrieb Akshat Kakkar <[email protected]>:
But I need to send 500 parallel queries to 500 different devices. If there is
no separate port for each instance, how will the response from devices be
processed?
On Thursday, 11 August 2016 1:58 PM, Frank Fock <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
You are binding a new port with any new Snmp instance. That's a big performance
overhead that is not needed. Simply use a single Snmp instance instead.
Best regards
Frank
> Am 10.08.2016 um 10:25 schrieb Akshat Kakkar <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi!I am using snmp4j version 2.2.1 for my java development. When I am sending
> snmp-get query to 1 or 2 device in parallel, then I am seeing that following
> code is taking around 15-16 mill seconds.
> Snmp snmp = new Snmp(dutm);snmp.send(sendPDU, udpTarget, null,
> responseListener);
> However, if I increase number of threads from 2 to 100, above code takes
> around 100 milli seconds.And if number of threads are increased to 500, time
> taken by above code increases to around 650 milli seconds.I am measuring time
> by using System.nanoTime() method in Java.
> Can anyone please help to explain this?
>
> -Akshat
> _______________________________________________
> SNMP4J mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
_______________________________________________
SNMP4J mailing list
[email protected]
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
