Hey... grab some popcorn! This kinda stuff is fun isn't it :-D
- James Snell
Software Engineer, Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM
James M Snell/Fresno/IBM - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These things I have spoken to you, so that in Me you may have peace.
In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the
world.
- John 16:33
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Bug with DOM2Writer
I must say that I am enjoying this thread immensely. :-) But I have an odd
sense of humor and love a friendly and spirited argument.
Rick Hansen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug with DOM2Writer
>
>
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> >
> > Sam, in general I don't support the principle of becoming bug
> > compatible.
>
> Oh, joy. A principles vs. pragmatism argument.
>
> A plea for sanity here: my own personal belief is that the
> correct behavior
> of code when receiving invalid input is undefined. So, let
> me turn the
> question around: why is the current behavior which produces
> not well formed
> output preferred over one that does?
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
