I suspect the EJB-COM connectors will not have significant installation, but I
base this mainly on the market: if demand was significant, all the J2EE vendors
would include them.

Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Mynmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Re: why uddi?


> I was wondering if for integration between Microsoft and "Rest of the World
> applications" (aka Java Platforms), have EJB-COM connectors taken off?
>
> Or they will be side-lined for complete WS type integration between the .NET
> and Java platforms?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harry
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: why uddi?
>
>
> > There needs to be Web services clients, but I do not think they will
> reside on
> > consumer machines.  I think consumers will access the likes of Yahoo, AOL,
> MSN,
> > each of which will in turn aggregate content from multiple providers,
> which they
> > already do, but increasingly using Web services.  Most of the content will
> be
> > provided/accessed through pre-arranged partnerships.  I do not envision a
> large
> > amount of ad hoc use of Web services.
> >
> > Where I am a consultant (Philadelphia, mid-way between New York and
> Washington,
> > DC), I am finally seeing the interest in SOAP and Web services picking up.
> > However, in all cases so far, it is for the purpose of application
> integration.
> > Some large corporations I work with are most interested in using SOAP/WS
> > internally to integrate their own systems, although their initial exposure
> was
> > connecting to partners who were early adopters.  I also work with a number
> of
> > ISVs and ASPs who simply see SOAP/WS as another technology by which to
> expose an
> > API.  They have all found some usefulness to Microsoft's DISCO or
> WS-Inspection.
> > None of them have done anything with UDDI.  Of course, this might simply
> mean
> > that they don't see an opportunity that is actually there.
> >
> > Scott Nichol
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "soap vamsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: Re: why uddi?
> >
> >
> > > thanks scott,
> > > Yes the B2C senario  the customers will rely on trusted search
> > > engines to look up webservices.But once again dont the clients
> > > need soap capable clients to use the services ,keeping in mind
> > > that every soap service will call for a specific soap client.
> > > vamsi
> > >
> > > On Mon, 27 May 2002 Scott Nichol wrote :
> > > >I personally have great doubts that UDDI will become important.
> > > >I agree with your reasoning in the
> > > >B2B scenario.  For B2C, it seems more likely that clients will
> > > >"learn" of a service via a "trusted"
> > > >source, much as consumers typically do searches today via Yahoo,
> > > >Google or even AOL.
> > > >
> > > >Scott Nichol
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "soap vamsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 01:35
> > > >Subject: why uddi?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I am not sure if this is the right place for this query ,I
> > > >will
> > > > > be grateful though for any information in this direction.
> > > > > My query is regarding the services that are likely to become
> > > > > webservices and the need for uddi.
> > > > > In my opnion there are two senarios where webservies might
> > > >find
> > > > > place
> > > > > 1.b2b.
> > > > > 2.b2c.
> > > > > Firstly in a b2b senario one business knows the other.Where is
> > > >the
> > > > > need to dynamically discover the service using uddi?
> > > > > In a b2c senario when if the client doesnot know the
> > > >business
> > > > > service provider the need for uddi is warrnated,but here the
> > > > > client(i am referening to an end user) needs to soap aware
> > > >and
> > > > > soap capable to avail those services.To what extent is this
> > > >a
> > > > > realistic expectation?
> > > > > If i am wrong in my extrapolation regd the likely
> > > >webservices,
> > > > > what services to become webservices?
> > > > >
> > > > > I may have been myopic in my opinion formation,pl feel free
> > > >to
> > > > > make me aware of the possiblities  that i have overlooked.
> > > > > Thaking you
> > > > > vamsi
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________
> > > > > Click below to visit monsterindia.com and review jobs in India
> > > >or
> > > > > Abroad
> > > > > http://monsterindia.rediff.com/jobs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Click below to visit monsterindia.com and review jobs in India or
> > > Abroad
> > > http://monsterindia.rediff.com/jobs
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to