> I wrote that paper, but suggested they put the change in Apache SOAP (We love that paper around here. RPC latency discussions are all the rage here, in our drab wretched lives. :-)
A couple of days (late March) before your TcpNoDelay patch was posted on this mailing list, we had locally found a different "fix" to the 200 ms delay. Instead of setting TcpNoDelay, we instead called shutDownOutput on the socket. For various fairly obvious reasons, setting TcpNoDelay is a better performance fix, so thanks for it! When I measured the result of using either fix by itself, I got about the same numbers. If I used them both together, I only got about 90% of the improvement I got if I used either individually. I didn't pursue an explanation. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter) PGP 0x91865119 38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25 73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
