Yes, when you get the object, you get the bodypart that contains it, and
then you do a getContent on the bodypart which returns an object.
Rich Catlett
Steeve Gilbert wrote:
>Would you be able to cast the attachement as an Object?
>
>Steeve...
>
>
>
>
>Rich Catlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 16/08/2001 11:56:02
>
>Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: (bcc: Steeve Gilbert/G_STGEORGES/CANAM_MANAC)
>
>Subject: Re: xml to bean convertition.
>
>
>How about sending the object as an attachment?
>
>Rich Catlett
>
>Steeve Gilbert wrote:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>Check that out. I've bean able to transfer bean with this tutorial. It
>>
>should answer you question.
>
>>http://www.eneris.com/~pablo/soapintro
>>
>>Steeve...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Evyatar Shoresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 16/08/2001 06:20:42
>>
>>Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>cc: (bcc: Steeve Gilbert/G_STGEORGES/CANAM_MANAC)
>>
>>Subject: xml to bean convertition.
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>I'm having a client-server aplication using soap as my messaging, my aim
>>is to send a xml document from the client that will be transfered as an
>>object ( pre-defined in a deployment descriptor ) to the method in the
>>server as a parameter.
>>
>>My problem is that no matter which descriptor i use the server takes my
>>xml as is and transfers it to the method as an Element object.
>>
>>Do you have any sample showing such a scenario?
>>
>>Thanx alot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
