I guess my brain(storage part ony I hope) is getting rusty. I've been using SOAPv2.1 and Xerces v1.3.1. So I have not tried the SOAP v2.2 yet.
I just downloaded the SOAP v2.2 and browsed through the source code. I see it still support *Xerces*. I am not sure how my memory got so rusty. Pae >Hi Pae, > >At least I am refering to Apache/SOAP v2.2.... I am not too sure about Phillip. > >Apache/SOAP v2.2 is no longer using the xerces >Really? How do you come about doing this? I tried to remove xerces but failed. >Could you tell me the detail on how to use this? > > >In v2.2 scenario, the size of crimson is only 183KB and 28KB for jaxp. >That will be really very cool !!! > >Thanks a million, >Boon Pang >At 09:21 PM 10/18/2001 -0700, you wrote: >>Are you folks using and referring to SOAP v2.1? If I am not wrong, >>Apache/SOAP v2.2 is no longer using the xerces, it is rather using >>the JAXP whch has two RIs, crimson and xalan. >> >>In v2.2 scenario, the size of crimson is only 183KB and 28KB for >>jaxp. Adding both of them just end up with 211KB only. So it ends >>up with 211KB without even trimming the package. >> >>If above case applies to both of you, 211KB is a good deal compare >>to 556KB. Isn't it? >> >>Am I missing something here? >> >> >>Pae >> >> >> >> >Hi Phillip, >> > >> >Can you please pass me a version of 556kb xerces.jar library? The 1/3 sized >> >library >> >will help my deployment via Java WebStart..The user needs only to wait for >> >the first time. >> >The following activation will not require any more download unless there >> >are changes. >> > >> >Boon Pang >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >At 04:54 PM 10/18/2001 +0100, you wrote: >> >>Is there any lighter version of Apache SOAP which doesn't need such a >> >>large xerces.jar file?? The file is originally 1,556kb and I managed to >> >>get that down to 556kb with some trimming but that is very large for an >> >>applet to download along with the SOAP jar file and the applet code >> >>itself. >> >>Has anyone found a way to slim down the size of the client? >> >>Thanks. >> >>Phillip Urrea >> > >
