RE: Passing Complex objects

[Chopra, Jitender]

Title: RE: Passing Complex objects

Could you send those posts (with examples) again .

 

Thanks 

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:11 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Passing Complex objects

A couple of months ago, I did have some success with .NET Beta 2 (client) and Apache SOAP (server). This was using .NET's WSDL.EXE tool and the Castor XML tool to exchange data contained in complex types defined via a WSDL file. At both ends the marshalling/serialisation was handled by the respective infrastructure, leaving the developer to simply implement the appropriate method signature or call it. The solution used 'literal' encoding within the SOAP envelope. If you search the archive you should find my posts (with examples), if not let me know I can send them again.

Andy Fawcett.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 December 2001 07:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passing Complex objects

I was wondering if people could share their experiences passing complex
types back via soap.  I am not so much interested in passing an object
between an apache soap server and an apache soap client.  I am more
interested in being able to expose a method that returns some complex
type and ensure that most soap implementations can use it.  For example
if a TCL SOAP client called a getNewFoo() on an Apache Soap service
would it be able to handle the Foo object that gets returned?  I am
curious about peoples experiences here.  Thanks a lot

Jared