-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, opinions needed!I suggest that you take a look at Apache Axis (http://xml.apache.org/axis). It provides a really nice transport framework that allows you to send and receive SOAP messages over almost any type of transport. You would also be able to use its serialization services. Apache Axis is very modular, and you should be able to pick and choose which parts of the system you'd like to use.Anne-----Original Message-----
From: PAPO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, opinions needed!Thanks for your reply.Yeah actualy I control both sides , client and server .The thing that made the whole project weird is that I am going to use a very small functionality provided by the SOAP itself.I should describe my try as a messaging soap-enabled protocol.I made my previous post , just to express my fears that , such a try for my (academic) implementation , might be totally out of the standar and famous way that SOAP is being used now.But that I think is a quite academic concern !Thanks again!P.A-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 5:28 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, opinions needed!SOAP was designed to be transport independent. It's only that most of the implementations support http(s) as the default transport. I do know that with Apache you can create your SOAP call and serialize it to a string to use for your own transport. I'm not sure if they support native sockets but I'd be surprised if they don't. I do know that several of the other packages out there in other languages support SMTP/POP, raw sockets, etc as an option. I think it is completely viable to use any transport mechanism that you require for you application. The only thing you need to worry about is interoperability with other product implementations of either your client or server end of the pipe. If you control both, then the transport shouldn't matter.
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: PAPO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, opinions needed!
Hi!
I would like your opinions or suggestions if available.I am in the design phase of a File Transfer server (similar to FTP) that will implement its protocol through SOAP.What I mean?That the server will exhange protocol commands with its clients through SOAP-XML envelopes. I have to say I quite familiar with XML parsers and Java too.The whole implementation will be in Java.In tha last 2 weeks I am investigating SOAP through books , web resources , etc. Most of the resources I have found ,are dealing with SOAP as part of the Web Services thing!Thats fine with me.But in my case I have some concernes!
As you can understand I want only to use SOAP messages , for my server and clients.Imagine that my envelopes will have some FTP like commands.Thats all.I am in the design phase of the protocol itself , and I am bit stuck in way , on how my messages will be travelling through the wire.The thing that worries me about is tha SOAP is almost bound top HTTP.In my case I dont think that I really need HTTP? What do you think about that?My solution is to send SOAP envelopes, through plain socket /stream connections .The other thing that worries me about is that i still dont know if existing JAVA SOAP libraries like APACHE , JAXM can help me deal easily with SOAP messages that are not bind to HTTP wrapper..has anyone tried something like that?So probably using Apache Xerces I have to provide a mechanism for marshalling and demarshalling my SOAP over the wire!I know it sounds like reinventing the wheel.
I really understand the use of HTTP when it comes to Web Services , but in my case I dont think is neccesary.I am really trying to find out , if that use of SOAP can be described as message-style SOAP .For those who might ask why SOAP , you can use any custom XML protocol , I shall answer that is the spec and I cant do anything about that.It is going to be a weird use of SOAP anyway!
Thank you in advance
A.P
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Title: Message
Thanks
for your reply!
From
those I have seen till now , i think that Apache SOAP is the most convenient ,
because it lets tou deal with the Envelope only in a quite flexible way , Axis
in far more web services oriernted.But anyway when it comes to dealing only with
the plain XML thing , the Axis and Apache SOAP are offering almost the same
flexibility!
Another solution would be a re-inventing the wheel solution , using only
Apache Xerces.Because my protocol is not going to define any huge envelopes , eg
CD
-> ChangeDirectory ( DirName) , I was thinking of creating with Xerces custom
made SOAP envelopes.The thing is I dont know if I am going to be accused of
actually not implementing SOAP in a proper manner!
Thanks
again!
A.P
- SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, opinions n... PAPO
- RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, o... Joe Pruitt
- RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issue... PAPO
- RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic i... Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: SOAP based FTP server , some academ... PAPO
- Re: SOAP based FTP server , some academ... Paramdeep Singh
- RE: SOAP based FTP server , some academic issues, o... Joe Pruitt