Scott, sorry to be lazy -- have you got a link to the list of improvements for this
version?
Thanks!
Liviu
Liviu Tudor
Cimage Novasoft Limited
www.cimagenovasoft.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: +44 (0)1344 767701
Direct Line: +44 (0)1344 767759
Centennial Court, Easthampstead Road, Bracknell, BERKS, RG12 1JZ
Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard
to understand.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the
HTTPUtils.post method
Yes, the current code base is more efficient and does cut out one of the in-memory
copies of the payload, so large payloads are processed more efficiently. There are
other speed improvements as well. As you have pointed out elsewhere, however, anyone
who wants a binary can only get one from September 2003. Fortunately, this includes
the performance improvements.
Scott Nichol
Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
because it is filtered to accept only mail from
specific mail lists.
----- Original Message -----
From: "WJCarpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Long delays experienced with Apache SOAP due to the HTTPUtils.post method
sn> Handling large SOAP payloads is something Apache SOAP is known to
sn> do slowly, but there is no major improvement planned. Several
Didn't one of the post-2.3.1 patches eliminate one of the in-memory
copies of the entire response payload (or am I just imagining that)?
If so, using the latest nightly CVS snapshot would at least give a
minor piece of relief on that score.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter) PGP 0x91865119
38 95 1B 69 C9 C6 3D 25 73 46 32 04 69 D6 ED F3
