Scott, I don't know if you have read my last message. The point is that I can't resolve the problem yet.
What I could do, is make a small example that reproduces the problem, and post the server code, the client code, the deployment descriptor, and the faults and exceptions messages, that would help? Thanks very much, tizo >-- Mensaje original -- >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: fault listener >Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:59:18 -0400 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 7:55 PM >Subject: Re: fault listener > > >Scott, > >>>>> >I have tried with the nightly build of Apache SOAP, and there is not more >exception in the client when I use ExceptionFaultListener, and there is >a exception in the server ><<<< > >What is the stack dump from the server exception? The nightly build should >have more useful information in the dump than the 2.3.1 release had. > >>>>> > (is that a bug in the production version?, if >it is, how could I fix that?) ><<<< > >You need to post the stack dump for anyone to determine the nature of the >problem. > >>>>> >, but I still have a problem: > >I have seen the code of ExceptionFaultListener, and it takes the original >exception, wraps it in a Parameter, puts the Parameter in a Vector, and >puts the last one in the detail entries of the Fault (with method setDetailEntries). >In the client side, when I've got a Fault, I get the detail entries Vector >(with method getDetailEntries), take the first element of this Vector (the >only one), and it is not of class Parameter; why?, shouldn't it be a Parameter? >Anyway, this object (the first one of the detail entries Vector) is of class >org.apache.crimson.tree.ElementNode2. ><<<< > >It will be a Parameter, unless an exception is thrown trying to de-serialize >a detail as a Parameter, in which case it will be kept as an Element. > >Scott Nichol > >Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address, >because it is filtered to accept only mail from >specific mail lists. >
