On 23 January 2011 03:14, Michael Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22 January 2011 13:24, Burak Arslan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  On 01/21/11 09:38, Michael Wood wrote:
> [...]
>>> I've only been using soaplib for a couple of months, and it's great,
>>> but one thing that's a little confusing is the proliferation of
>>> unfinished branches.  i.e 0.8 beta, 1.0 beta, 2.0 alpha, 2.1 beta.
>>>
>>> I realise this is probably just because of the history of the project,
>>> but it would be a lot less confusing if someone could just tag a 1.0
>>> final release or something so that someone who wants stable and
>>> working code (even if it's not guaranteed to be bug free) knows what
>>> to use.
>>
>> https://github.com/arskom/rpclib/tree/soaplib-1.0.0
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/soaplib/1.0.0
>>
>> https://github.com/arskom/rpclib/tree/soaplib-0.8.2
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/soaplib/0.8.2
>>
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/soap/2010-November/000325.html
>
> Oh, thanks for the info.
>
> I see they were released and announced just after I started using
> soaplib, but before I joined this mailing list, so I didn't know about
> them.  Also, the above tags do not exist in the current
> soaplib/soaplib repository and did not exist in the arskom/soaplib
> when I last pulled from it before it disappeared.
>
> I see that there's no difference between 1.0.0-beta8 and 1.0.0 release
> except for the version, so perhaps that should be done in the
> soaplib/soaplib repository too (e.g. by cherry-picking
> 2801978f51390772de0ac7ff05f0854dddfdd076 from arskom/rpclib).
>
> The situation for 0.8 is the same (see
> ee25b4c25d23f1f54d86f30103762ae9c7f2e7aa in arskom/rpclib).

Sorry, it's more complicated for 0.8.

soaplib-0.8.2 is basically 2f4dae57589fd20be6d50137f833486eab9284eb
with the "-beta2" removed from tag_build, but the 0_8 branch in
soaplib/soaplib has some extra commits that are not in arskom/rpclib.
So I'm not sure what's best there.  Maybe a 0.8.2.1 or 0.8.3 could be
released as well as tagging 0.8.2?

-- 
Michael Wood <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Soap mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soap

Reply via email to