On 12/16/11 19:07, azurit wrote: > what are the goals until mark 'beta' can be removed ? :) we are running > rpclib for some time in production on quite big services. > > --- > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/arskom/rpclib/pull/115#issuecomment-3179775
rpclib will be released as stable when 1) all tests are green and 2) all of the following issues are fixed: https://github.com/arskom/rpclib/issues?sort=created&direction=desc&state=open&page=1&milestone=2 you should help me with those if you want rpclib to be released in non-beta status asap. those are real problems that affect some use cases. so i can't lift the beta tag w/o solving these. the beta tag gives me right to slightly break backwards compatibility every release. so currently i rather like it. see here: http://arskom.github.com/rpclib/h_and_f.html#versioning when it's lifted, rpclib will be a true production-worthy library. i don't see this happening soon given the amount of contributions i'm getting (slightly higher than zero) and given the complexity of the sqlalchemy recursion loop problem. best burak _______________________________________________ Soap mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soap
