On 04/03/12 17:51, Burak Arslan wrote:
hi alex,
here's a test case for us to work on:
https://gist.github.com/2292401
seems to be working with my latest patch (which fixed some other
problem) could you try to reproduce your issue using that one?
best,
burak
On 04/03/12 13:41, Alex wrote:
Burak, thank you for the feedback.
I skimmed the spec very quick and from what I gather, you want an<any>
tag instead of an<element> tag inside the<complexType><sequence>
(...)
</complexType></sequence> hierarchy, right? (correct me if i'm
wrong here.)
Yes.
It took me some time to "begin to begin to get started", because I
wasn't familiar with git. After dealing with that, I set up a
development environment that would allow me to tinker with the code
you provided.
For now, I just want to deal with one piece of the puzzle - produce
the schema that looks exactly like the spec says.
This is what I do (based on the example from your last email):
class SomeType(ComplexModel):
arbitraryElement = AnyXml(
schema_tag='{%s}any' % rpclib.const.xml_ns.xsd,
namespace='##other',
process_contents='lax')
This is what I get:
<xs:complexType name="SomeType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="arbitraryElement" type="xs:anyType"
minOccurs="0" nillable="true" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
What I expected:
<xs:complexType name="SomeType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
Having examined the diff, I saw that it was supposed to work, at least
partially. This is based on the fact that
\interface\xml_schema\model\complex.py does verify whether the type is
AnyXml, and it attempts to set processContents, if it is present in
the declaration.
I set a breakpoint in the beginning of complex_add, but the breakpoint
is never hit. For some reason, the function is never called, thus the
schema is generated in a regular fashion.
There are no calls to complex_add anywhere in the code, but the
function is set as a handler for ComplexModelBase.
As you can see in the definition above, SomeType is derived from
ComplexModel, which is derived from ComplexModelBase. I cannot make
sense of it, everything looks right, but not quite. This is where I
got stuck.
Can you shed some light on this?
I created a new RST file that reflects what I know so far. There's not
much content yet, just two paragraphs :-) Questions related to this
part:
1. what's the most appropriate name for this section? I chose
"Creating advanced custom types", but this tutorial is XML-centric, so
that should be reflected somewhere.
2. should this be a new file, or should I extend an existing one
[which one]?
3. are there any parts in the manual one should read before trying to
write such patches? I've read everything that seems to be related, but
my vision is still blurry. Maybe I missed something?
Alex
_______________________________________________
Soap mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soap
