Burak Arslan wrote at 2012-7-30 21:59 +0300: >On 07/30/12 18:38, Alex wrote: >> >> 1. is there a planned date of spyne availability via pip or easy_install? >Good news: 1) The rpclib namespace and the spyne namespace are going to >be identical for the foreseeable future. 2) I'm not committing anything >besides bugfixes and documentation to master branch between now and the >release, so doing a git clone git://github.com/arskom/spyne is as safe >as an easy_install. (actually even more, given the perpetual state of >beta that this project has been boasting for the past couple of years)
Only for those who use "spyne" directly. Things become more difficult for packages that built upon "spyne". If a package built upon plays well with Python package management, it is sufficient to list it in the "install_requires" declaration; if not, the documentation must contain a (much more) complex description how to install the dependencies. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Soap mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soap
