On 04/24/15 17:57, Chris Beck wrote: > Hi Burak, > > Is this work that you are doing to expnd on the implementation the > wsdl parser for the 0.12 Spyne release > (http://spyne.io/docs/2.11/faq.html#how-do-i-implement-a-predefined-wsdl)?
Yes. > So if you use the Suds methodology, which *doesn't* have the problem > of extending simple types, and limit the recursion depth it might get > the best of both worlds. > Spyne imports everyting exactly once using correct order given your starting point. So I didn't see any need for a recursion limit. If you later use the types from the schema to implement services, your wsdl document only has what you use. I don't know how suds does it, but I do know that, having briefly worked on what became 0.4, it's not exactly a joy to work with -- too much coupling between what should have been different api layers. Spyne evolved way slower than suds so it doesn't have that problem. If you implement what's missing (see my previous post) you'll be able to use Spyne's schema parser. On 04/28/15 17:54, Chris Beck wrote: > Burak - is it still to be hoped that Spyne will consider its wsdl > parser mature enough to be approved for general automated use in 0.12? There's no WSDL parser in Spyne yet. However, once the schema parsing is done, wsdl parsing doesn't seem to be much of a problem. Best, Burak _______________________________________________ Soap mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soap
