So,  it seems at least one individual can appreciate my twisted sense of humor.  
Thanks Scott.  This whole Sal bashing thing is just
one aspect of what I was trying to convey to the exchange via the light bulb post.  It 
is useless and counter-productive as about
75% of all posts are.  Thank God for the delete key.  Unfortunately I almost wore out 
my second delete key...that was until I
figured out how to filter certain folks who seem to just love to see their names and 
constant ramblings about absolutely nothing
contributory, in print.  I feel some folks seem to think quantity is much better than 
quality.  And then there are those who think
if they start rambling about some scientific equation/therory on flight that we will 
all hold them in high esteem and they will be
certainly be elevated by all of us as "experts".   I must admit though that I am a 
guilty party also.  (not as being a expert for
sure, just ramblings)    But its great...no?  This is America and we should all have 
the same opportunity to make big fools of
ourselves just as much as the next guy!
So.....who wants to take bets on what the next seemingly endless thread will be about? 
 I can hardly wait.
Cliff Lindgren

Scott Marshall wrote:

> With apologies to Cliff L.  for reworking his recent post.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Q:  How many RCSE subscribers does
> it take to bash Sal at NSP (insert the vendor of the month)?
>
> A:  616:
>
> 1 to post to RCSE  that they've had a problem with NSP.
>
> 14 to share similar experiences of dealing with Sal and how the
> situation could have been handled differently.
>
> 7 to caution about the dangers of dealing with Sal
>
> 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts
> about NSP
>
> 156 to write about the vendor bashing and its inappropriateness to this
> mail list.
>
> 109 to post that this list is not about vendor bashing and to please take
> this email exchange to alt.bitch.moan
>
> 111 to defend the posting to this list saying that
> we are all buy our planes from somewhere and therefore the posts **are**
> relevant to this mail list.
>
> 106 to debate vendor personalities to determine who sucks.
>
> 27 to post URLs where one can see examples of
> who "really" sucks
>
> 14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly,
> and to post corrected URLs.
>
> 33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote
> them including all headers and footers, and then add "Me Too."
>
> 12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing
> because they cannot handle the NSP controversy.
>
> GO FLY!
>
> Scott Marshall
> IMSF, SLC, UT
>
> P.S. Temps in the 50's today (Jan thaw). I'm looking forward to flying the
> Wingo when I get home. Then when it gets to dark to fly, I'll go in and work
> on planes to take to Phoenix.
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
> "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to