As far as I remember the birds that glide well have thin, heavily
cambered airfoils, a bit like those used in the old days on full-size
aircraft. Never been a smashing success when built in cantilever form,
for aircraft (possibly with the exception for some extremely slow-flying
model gliders). But what birds have are excellent autostabilisation, they
can feel the slightest thermal, they can vary camber in flight, they
can vary span a bit and vary sweep a lot, and have numerous flow control devices, on 
their wings,
et cetera. Gulls, Gannets and ducks even use their feet for aerodynamic control
when flying slow, and all is packed in a very light packet, that is 
self-repairing, except when suffering from age, man, or other vermin!

I have flown my THL with a gyro, and that makes it able to fly in very
windy and blustery conditions (15-25 mph with ease), and an more effcient flying wing 
could possibly fly as well as any gull, but the problem is the control and the
dragless power-on-demand system. An electric version of the ornithopter
flown in Toronto might be the solution, but that isn't dragless, nor does
it use a birdlike airfoil (all tries with such airfoils on ornithocopters
have been failures, as far as I am aware). Neither can it vary its sweep,
and it does carry a fin (no birds do that, as you know), et cetera, et cetera.

And the flapping mechanism is drag-producing, as parts of it is external, and
there have to be various dragproducing holes in the fuselage (bird's have very 
small ortifices :-). On the other hand birds can NOT dynamic soar at the speeds
seen at Parker Mountain when Joe is there!

Yours truely,


Tord,
Sweden

*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*'`'*.,.*
-- 
If reply difficulties - use [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tord S. Eriksson, Ovralidsg.25:5, S-422 47 Hisings Backa, Sweden

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to