>But it is clear that we need more power/range than what current 802.11x can offer.

Apart from range (limited) the real killer with something like 802.11 is latency. You probably won't notice it with just one or two people flying but if you had a contest with a couple of dozen then the transmitters would share the bandwidth by waiting their turn. (An individual transmitter could wait quite a long time before getting use of the medium, in the order of many tens of milliseconds.)(Actually, I've found that in practice a handful of transmitters get to dominate the medium and the rest rarely, if ever, get out.)

The present PCM system works extremely well for what it is -- its cheap, its quite reliable and its economical on spectrum.

The problem is that there are lots of other users contending for band space who could easily move to modern radio technologies but are reluctant to give up "their" slice of spectrum. So the public uses like R/C and wireless networking tend to be crammed into little corners of the spectrum that nobody else wants (the 2.4GHz band used by most wireless network equipment is open because its a set of frequencies that are absorbed by water molecules -- not that good for communication but excellent for microwave ovens). Now that governments have discovered that there's a cash cow to be milked auctioning off the spectrum -- one of the reasons for the move to digital TV is to free up half the old UHF TV band and the VHF TV bands for sale -- so the chances of us getting a slice for free is, I'd guess, relatively slim.

I'd love to move to spread spectrum. Just not at microwave frequencies. If we could get our hands on just one redundant UHF TV channel that would keep us happy for a very long time.

Martin Usher

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

Reply via email to