John, with what might be a fairly noticeable JR presence at the Nats, I'm just 
guessing of course, may I propose out loud that JR might consider checking TX's 
there also. A generally good turnout would give you a good crossection of TX"s 
to start with.
I think you are getting the idea that I support your thoughts.

Regards, Dave Corven.
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "John Diniz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Food for thought. With all the talk about batteries and redundancy in the 
> terms 
> of saving your expensive RC model I wonder how many people are concerned 
> about 
> their Tx condition and RF output. When was the last time you had your radio 
> in 
> for service and to check the output freq? We've used scanners at events like 
> the 
> USRA Race Over Rantoul to check Tx output. The biggest issue is old radios 
> that 
> are splashing over onto adjacent freq's. This usually more of an issue for 
> the 
> guy on the adjacent channel as the guy with the offending radio say's it 
> works 
> fine. We'll probably be checking radio's at the LSF Soaring Masters to keep 
> this 
> from happening. If its been more than a couple years you might want to get 
> that 
> radio in for a check up.
> 
> John
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
> "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that 
> subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
> turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are 
> generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format

Reply via email to