Don --
Good to hear about the new Berg stuff being able to stand up to Poway!
It's true the early, early versions of the Berg 4- and 5-channel
(pre-Castle) receivers had issues with the DSP, and hence released the
DSP II, which I can only assume is at least what they are using in the
new Castle Bergs.
For what it's worth, I fly Berg 5's (pre-Castle stock) in my DLGs, and
have never had a problem. Flew my Polecat EZBD to great new heights
(2000 ft or more) on Sunday (beating Gordy and his Super AVA, of
course!) using a spare Berg 5 DSPII. Yeah, I certainly thought "Oh man,
I'm 2500 feet up with a Berg!", but that thing never failed me. Two
weeks ago I managed an LSF IV 1-hour flight with the same ship. This
Sunday, however, I only managed 45 minutes - which was not the fault of
the receiver. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/5/06 4:32:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had problems with the earlier Berg receivers glitching badly &
ultimately
I have used the Berg Micro Stamp 4 in my HL models for several
without a problem. I recently purchased new models from Castle
Creations, and installed one in my new XP 4.5. I flew it in this
weekend's IHLGF without a glitch. Probably the worst environment any
of us will encounter - 12 transmitter in a very small area. The
transmitter is a Vision on channel 37.
Don Richmond
San Diego, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hilaunch.com
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
