The Profi 4000 has all of the 14MZ functions that count (sorry- no audio) "plus' several more that most sailplane guys will never use but are there for the really technical applications.
Not very popular because of the style but it is fantastic if you use a tray or strap. Programming is really logical and quite easy once you understand it and is is a lot less expensive than the 14. Too bad Hitec will not support them much longer but we all hope they will come out with a radio as complete to replace it someday. My two have been bullet proof for about six years. Jack On Dec 4, 2007 5:53 PM, Bill's Email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ed Anderson wrote: > > Craig, > > > > There are several factors why the JR 9303 2.4 is getting more press than > the > > Futaba. > > > > 1) This is a soaring list serve and the 9303 has received much greater > > acceptance as a 6+ servo sailplane radio than any of the Futaba > transmitters. > > True enough. Unfortunately not enough of the 14MZ radios are being used > in soaring (big in aerobatics and helis) to realize what an incredible > radio it is for soaring. Assign any function to any stick, switch, > slider, etc. Including mixes, trims, whatever. Whatever you can think of > you can do. Same holds true for the less expensive 12Z and 12FG. > > Up to 9 flight conditions per model. Each condition allows you to change > EVERYTHING except where the functions are assigned and the channel. > Anything else can be changed. Throws, mixes, etc. > > The Futaba 12 to 14 series radios are truly powerful and flexible > radios. Honestly I cannot imagine having to mess with anything less now. > Kind of like once I got a microwave I could not imagine how I got along > without one.!! > > > > 2) Futaba entered the 2.4 GHz market with a very limited function > transmitter > > which was not of much interest to the 6+ servo sailplane market. They > have also > > come to market much later and much more slowly than Spektrum/JR, so > Futaba has a > > tiny installed base compared to the others. Many Futaba users, like > myself, > > have purchased Spektrum modules for our Futaba Radios. That is the same > > technology that JR uses. > > True for airplanes. Futaba has been in the car/boat world for sometime > and has pretty god market penetration there. > > > > 3) Spektrum/JR, XPS and Futaba all use Spread Spectrum of one form or > another, > > but only Futaba uses continuous frequency hopping. I will let the > wizards argue > > which is better, but they all seem to work, so to most users, the > difference > > does not matter much. This is like PPM vs. PCM, both are 72 MHz FM. > Which is > > better vs. which is most popular. They both work. > > In a sense I agree. It can become a very academic argument. Personally, > I like the continuous hopping scheme over the other types of > implementation. > > > > > 4) There is a lot more hands on experience in the user community with > > Spektrum/JR than with XPS or Futaba. > > SS I agree. But radios in general not so much. At many large contest > Airtronics still rules the roost with Futaba and JR splitting the > remainder. Plus it can be very regional as well. > > > > > 5) Spektrum/JR offers the widest range of receiver choices. For many > people, > > this is very important. > > In SS this is true. However, given how tiny these things are I can't see > that as an issue. At least for me. Even the 14 channel RX is smaller > than most 4 channel 72 RXs!! > > > > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" > and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note > that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format > with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and > AOL are generally NOT in text format > -- Jack Iafret Home and Hobbies
