Two 3s instead of two 9s sure makes a difference.  :)

Chuck

At 10:18 AM 12/5/2007, you wrote:
Wow, in 1933 it must have just been you and Karlton out in the middle of no where. You guys were way ahead of the times. LOL

Occasionally/often frustrated;
...never defeated...


> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:40:02 -0600
> To: [email protected]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] 2.4 GHz
>
> I agree that the Evo is the best available transmitter for most
> sailplanes. Since Hitec, Futaba, and JR make transmitters that are
> capable of doing what I need, my choice is based on feel and balance
> as well as programming methods. I still remember the disgusting feel
> I had when I tried to get used to my first JR plastic porcupine
> transmitter. Awkward feel and balance with all the switches in the
> wrong places with no way to put them where they belong. My aluminum
> box transmitters had a much better feel and balance and I could put
> the switches where I needed rather than where someone else decided
> they should be. My first programmable transmitter was a Micropro and
> I understood the logic behind the programming. Never did understand
> the logic behind the random selections of buttons and the correct
> sequence to accomplish what I wanted to do in my Airtronics, Futaba,
> and Hitec transmitters and I always had to have the manual when I
> went to change anything.
>
> In 1933, I had a booth next Karlton at Visalia and he tried to sell
> me on his pizza box transmitters but I preferred my single stick
> Micropro. By 2001, Micropro was long out of business and I was using
> a Hitec transmitter when I had a radio problem at Visalia. After the
> first day, Karlton talked me into trying a Cockpit MM. Five minutes
> into the first flight the next day, Karlton sold me a radio. The
> Cockpit had absolutely the best feel and balance of any two stick
> transmitter I have ever used. I promptly sold all my Futaba and
> Hitec transmitters except for one that I kept for models that needed
> more that the Cockpit could provide. I ordered an Evo the day
> Karlton announced that he was accepting orders. It took over a year
> but I received one of the first Evos that were imported into the US
> and I promptly sold my last Hitec. The Evo has so much better
> ergonomics and programming than anything else available today that I
> can't see ever changing unless both my Evos quit working and new ones
> are longer available.
>
> My backup Evo has been converted to 2.4 with XPS and test flown in
> the old model I use for testing new and repaired radios. I am now
> waiting for end pin receivers to convert all my models to XPS.
>
> Chuck
>
> PS. I still feel the Cockpit MM has the best ergonomics of any
> transmitter I have ever flown.
>
> At 07:09 PM 12/4/2007, you wrote:
> >I tried to respond to Jack Iafret's posting but got bounced by the system so
> >I am posting this separately. I agree with Jack that the Profi has very
> >powerful programming. However, I traded mine for 2 - 12 Ch Evos because, for
> >me, the programming is even easier, although with a few less options (most
> >of which I would never use), and because the Evo has a much better
> >geometry/weight for hand launch. I have been flying the Evo for several
> >years in TD, F5J, F5B, hand launch and a couple of electric sport planes and > >helicopters. XPS offers a great, easy to install 2.4 GHz module for the Evo
> >(and Profi for that matter). I have been using the XPS 2.4 Ghz system in a
> >F5J Graphite with a good bit of carbon in the fuselage. It seems to work
> >great so far. XPS now has 8 and 10 Ch full range receivers. They are coming
> >out with end pin versions of these as well as top and end pin 12 Ch
> >receivers. For all the gliders the end pin receiver will be a very positive
> >addition. I won't comment on the schedule for these new receivers because
> >that is one of the more frustrating things about dealing with XPS. The 2.4
> >GHz components from XPS that I do have though work great and I get to keep
> >the Evo programming. I will wait a little longer for end pin receivers
> >before I switch to a 9303.
> >
> >
> >
> >Bruce T.
> >
> >
> >RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send
> >"subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
> >unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME
> >turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
> >are generally NOT in text format
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


----------
Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. <http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_powerofwindows_112007>Power up!

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

Reply via email to