Paul,
Excuss me for being too simple in my response. The MH32 is the same
shape. I belive if you modify the 7037 thin it a little and decamber it
just a bit you end up with the MH32.
Thus the speed and penetration.
By the way how much of a dog is the 7037? Anyone who flys it may
respond.
Sorry,
RB
Paul Klissner wrote:
>
> That's interesting, because my Dominator has an MH32 airfoil,
> and it *moves* quick, even unballasted. It was one of the first
> things I noticed about that glider. It just cruises and penetrates
> even when its not carrying.
>
> I don't know how much the planform contributes to its speed
> and locomotion alone, but I thought that 7037 is notoriously slow,
> and good primarily for hang-time.
>
> So if the MH32 and 7037 look so similar, why the apparent
> discrepancy in behavior?
>
> -Paul
>
> Jill and Rick Brown wrote:
>
> > If you overlay the two foils in Compufoil the MH32 is very nearly a copy
> > of the 7037. Very slight difference.
> >
> > RB
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Forgot to add question regarding airfoil. Not familiar with the European
> > > sections, is the MH32 airfoil anything like a 7037??
> > >
> > > Anyone familiar with the K-2 Ship from NSP. Looks like it has all
> > > the attributes of the more expensive molded F3J ships on the market.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Gus
> > >
> > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
