I kinda disagree.  Were not really launching on the same line everyones using 
certainly by the end of a contest.       Specifically,,,, after the first bunch 
of launches, yes the winch frame  and motor is the same constant but the lines 
at big events tend to get trashed from abrasions.  This happens especially when 
were launching crosswind and downwind when its too costly of time to switch 
winches into the wind.    So,  as a result,  the bigger the plane the more 
carefull you have to launch so as to not break the line from previous line 
abuse. 

Im letting a large contest secret out of the bag here in this statement, but I 
generally fly a smaller area plane at big events when were using braided line 
and were not able to check the line before a flight.   So that way I know I can 
take advantage of launch height when others cant push hard on the launch.    
Plus,,,,, one by one I watch others with big planes break lines and take score 
hits that drop them out of the running when in contest with no throw away 
rounds.  

Again, FAI events dont penalize your flight because of a broken line. The lines 
are your own and you can use what you want in strength, and check and test 
lines every flight if you wish. A broken line offers you a relaunch in a 
working time window.   Seems more fair. You want the outcome of the event to be 
decided in the air afterall!
  Richard
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joe Rodriguez 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 10:40 AM
  Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2


  Don't change the line " Learn how to launch " If you go big and break the 
line!! fly it out!!  You launch on the same equipment that everyone else is 
using, no need to change equipment for the select few " Learn to launch " 
  and besides who says bigger is better(-:   Airbus is sure having a tough time.

  smokinjoe
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Darwin N. Barrie 
    To: [email protected] ; SC Johnson 
    Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:48 AM
    Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2


    I'm sure this will be a very dynamic plane and competitive with the Euro 
models. My concern is the launching equipment. With the current crop of 
moldies, line breaks and winch bogging and ultimate failure are becoming more 
prevelant.  Heavy enough line for these new "super ships," will be a burden for 
the lighter planes. Yes, I've CD'd lots of contests and a few big ones.

    We've tried some heavy line and it is great for the heavier planes but the 
lighter planes and 2 meters have a helluva time overcoming the line drag and 
weight. 

    Where do we draw the line? 

    Darwin N. Barrie
    Chandler AZ

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: SC Johnson 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:08 AM
      Subject: [RCSE] Icon 2


      OK all you sailplane junkies (Edgar, DP, you know who you are...) - 
there's been a lot of discussion about the new High End and some vague 
comparisons to the "old" Icon. Since Don has even stopped denying it, I thought 
its about time for some news about the new Icon 2 that Maple Leaf Design is 
developing. Its been in the works for over a year, and news has been leaking 
for a while. Get in line folks - this is gonna be a biggy, both literally and 
figuratively. Designed by the intrepid Dr. Mark Drela, this new high aspect 
ratio F3J/Thermal Duration plane has a wing span of 150" (3.81 m) and a VERY 
slender 2.4 friendly pod and carbon boom. I have had the privilege of fondling 
the parts and pieces as the design was developed, and I can tell you that this 
plane is way-cool. The first prototypes of the Icon 2 are being tested as I 
type this, and the first production planes (mine - VBG) will be delivered just 
after the first of the year. I understand there's already a list. 


      No - I don't have photos or drawings.....and leave Don alone - he's busy 
working on my planes. Just get on the list.....


      Whahooo...
      Steve Johnson

Reply via email to