Simple test take a radio that goes PCM and PPM take three receivers wad up
the antennas on the receivers and place them on a wood table off the ground
all three in a row all on the same channel.
Now do a range test ONE at a time PLEASE. SAME TX, SAME Battery pack in TX
same battery for the receiver. Now take the TX far enough away where the
PCM NO LONGER WORKS it goes in to fail safe, mark the distance. Switch
batteries and fire up the PPM receiver go to the same spot with the TX where
the PCM stopped. Note the glitches of the PPM or move further if the PPM is
not glitching. Mark the spot and do the same test with IPD.
SIMPLE TEST we did it this morning IPD wins GLITCH down. But do the test
yourself and you WILL SEE!.
Remember it was Multiplex that brought PCM to R/C so why would they replace
it? Answer IPD is BETTER!
Smooth Sailing,
Karlton Spindle
http://www.MultiplexRC.com
----- Original Message -----
From: YK Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] PCM is Superior
> It is less likely that IPD can improve RF link integrity, if I
> understand Jason's definition correctly. I define integrity as the
> link between the stick and the flight. Not just RF, interference, IPD,
> servo or mechanical. That means an effective IPD should meet Jason's
> requirement to some extend.
>
> YK Chan
> Seattle
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 6:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] PCM is Superior
>
>
> > In a message dated 7/17/00 10:22:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > << I learned more from Jason Werner's post regarding IPD than I have
> seen
> > or read elsewhere. As previously stated, if IPD increases the
> integrity
> > of the RF link between the TX and RX over what is currently
> available,
> > I'll use it.
> > See Ya, >>
> > I agree Simon, Jason's post explained it very well for me also.
> Bill
> > Grenoble
> > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send
> "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
