I hope I'm not beating a dead horse here but I want, never mind that,
I need a duckie, but now I'm sacred!!
Following what Gordie told us all about the fabulous antenna article
in MAN, I was anxious to get a hold of the latest issue to find out
what light Don Edberg would/could shed on the whole subject of
flexible duckie antennae (antennas?). Well, knowng Don's affiliation
with Futaba and being an 8U user myself, I was pretty diappointed
and discouraged to see that he seems to have no confidence in them
whatsoever even though he appears to advocate (in the arcticle anyway)
the soldering of receiver antennae all to heck!!
In the article they even showed a couple of photos of a guy with a
bent antenna on his receiver like it's funny or something (OK, I admit
it, it IS funny, but only when it's on someone else's TX!).
So my question to the group is: Can anyone out there in RCSE-land give
us all some feedback on their experiences using a duckie for far
ranging thermal soaring? If so, what brand is it, what brand is your
TX, where'd you get it, and what results are you getting? Are duckies
reliable, or should they only be trusted for relatively in-close HLG
and slope flying?
I mean, it's 2001, we can make reliable tiny little micro 8 ch
receivers! We have quite small 3000 mAh NiMh batteries! We have killer
torque metal geared micro servos! Why is it that we can't make a nice
short flexible antenna that's either supplied OEM or is at least
approved by the manufacturers as an aftermarket part? No FCC tirades
please, we don't ALL live in the USA. ;-)
TIA
Mark Gervais
Montreal, Canada
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]