Maybe, but which is the more important surface? I'm basing this on advice
given to me when I was working on my 3m, full flying stab ship. Most
people on the list recommended a fairly torquey servo for the elevator.
At 01:00 AM 5/1/01 -0400, Mark Drela wrote:
>
>>The ability to share the elevator servo load between two lessor torque
>>servos, rather then having one giant servo of the elevator and a smaller
>>one for the rudder.
>
>You got that backwards. A full flying elevator hinged at its mean
>quarter-chord puts negligible airloads on its servo. The rudder
>servo will see larger airloads.
>
>- Mark
>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe"
and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
____________________________________________________________________________
Brett Jaffee: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brett's Slope and Power Home Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee
OnTheWay Quake 2 server utility: http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway
The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page: http://www.bayarea.net/~nathan/extra300/
____________________________________________________________________________
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
