With respect to the winch load values being quoted and using those values in 
the previously-posted formula for wingrod sizing, I'm getting some large 
wingrod sizes.  For example, for a 2M wing, a 150 pound winch load requires 
a 7/16" wingrod, and a 50 pound winch load needs a 5/16" wingrod.  These are 
hefty wingrods.

I'm sure that this formula is correct, but I suspect that the winch load 
values tend to get overstated.  150-200 pounds is no doubt a value tha _can_ 
be reached with a strong winch and "full-pedal zoom launches".  I also 
suspect that a 50 pound winch load is still quite respectable and would be a 
"strong" launch by a typical sport flyer, and even 30 pounds is a good 
launch.

I've not measured these values, but plugging known wingrod sizes from planes 
that have been flown successfully for years into the formula I've 
back-calculated these 30-50 pound winch loads.

Has anyone actually instrumented a sailplane to measure the load aty the 
towhook on launch?  I'd be interested in seeing those values.

--Bill


>From: "Joe & Jan Wurts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mark Drela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [RCSE] Joiner sizing
>Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:32:58 -0700
>
> >I seriously doubt you will see 200 lb pull on your winch.
>
>This number is probably initiated by me.  We will occasionally
>(rarely) see this kind of load on an F3B winch.  Much more frequent
>on two man F3J towing however.  With a little bit of headwind,
>and some lift on tow, the line tension will grow extremely fast,
>frequently far faster than the pilot realizes.  This is how most
>planes die on tow.  I'd rate the 200 lbs case in the 99th percentile,
>assuming that you have your plane set up well for launch (most
>people have very conservative launch set-ups, which ends up
>precluding the high launch tensions).
>
>I end up designing my planes for the 200 lb load case, and in
>fact, design for deflection limits rather than plane failure.  By my
>calculations, the Icon gets to the 200 lb case at a little bit over
>40 ksi compression max. on the upper spar.  Using the 100 ksi
>number, this points to about a 500 lb line load failure case.
>Designing to failure at 200 lbs will get you an airplane that is
>pretty flexible on an energetic tow.
>
>All that said, for F3B, the dead air line tension gets to only 50-60
>lbs, and in mild headwinds, about 100 lbs.  Still, one thermal on
>tow and the tension can quickly build towards the 200 lb number.
>Smaller airplanes don't have this issue nearly as much due to
>line drag losses reducing the power available.
>
>joe
>
>
>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to