|
If you do decide to
end up using a product like Imron, invest in a good quaility breathing gear,
preferably a force fed fresh air supply or at the very least a quality
respirator fitted with organic vapour cartridges and change them
regularly. Imron contains isocyanate, very nasty stuff, cumulative build
up in your body and you can become sensitised to it.
Les.
>Message: 7
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:28:25 -0800 From: Gavin Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [RCSE] auto paints >Basically any auto paint will work. Acrylic Lacquer is easiest to spray >and quickest drying. It also compounds very easily. Can't get it in >major CA cities anymore :( Acrylic Enamel will give a harder finish and >better shine (especiallly if you use the hardener). Can't get it in >major CA cities anymore :( The new environment Dupont Chroma-sys. >paints are nice, but expect to pay about $100.00 per mixed quart. I use >IMRON. It is nasty stinky, and very toxic, but provides a nice hard >surface for moulded wings. Can't get it in major CA cities anymore, so I >periodically go to Santa Cruz, where it is still available in in a new >'environment friendly' form. >Gavin Bill Harris wrote: > > I recall reading about problems with Krylon, and Lustrecote is _muy_ > expensive. I have the necessary hardware (compressor and paint guns), and > it wouldn't be big deal to buy the software in quart or gallon quantities. > > It's a new building technique to add to my quiver... > > --Bill |
- [RCSE] auto paints Bill Harris
- Re: [RCSE] auto paints Bill Johns
- RE: [RCSE] auto paints Chris Bayley
- Re: [RCSE] auto paints Bill Harris
- Re: [RCSE] auto paints Gavin Botha
- Re: [RCSE] auto paints Easwen6877
- Re: [RCSE] auto paints Les and Gypsy Stockley
- Re: [RCSE] auto paints Easwen6877

