If you actually read my post, you would notice that I did not tell how to give away the donation. I think it's great that Jr or anyone donates. IT WAS PUBLICIZED ON THIS SOARING EXCHANGE FOR THE 100th PLACE to recieve the radio. I was asking if it was discussed at the Pilots meeting of the different way it was going to be awarded. Your way of thinking would be to change the rules and tell anyone? CVRC changed it, not Jr as you stated.
Speaking of ethics. At your clubs last event, Spring 2004 raffle. The two drawing tickets were looking at the names and throwing them back in the tub. Sometimes two or three times. This went on for 5 - 10 minutes until everyone was yelling about it. Then your club stopped this practice. Yeah, I WAS THERE AND WITNESSED IT MYSELF. Also I'm sure some of the items awarded was given to Ed Lockhart until 3/4 of the way into it, someone noticed that there was another person named Ed there. They called Ed Lockhart until they noticed a different last name. I never said anything until now. Flame yourself Mr. Carbon It was for JR to determine what they wanted to do to give a prize away. I you can't always believe what you read, here or otherwise. If there was a change in JR's > thinking on how to distribute the donated item, thats their right, not > yours. And I don't ever recall distribution of donated prizes to be an > issue that needed to be discussed at a pilots meeting. Flame on, ye of higher ethics than I. Jim Thomas > I remember the posting stating 100th place was the winner. > Was the rule changes announced at the pilots meeting saturday? > Was it changed after the contest started? > Why did he not know of the flyoff? (rule change) > Did he finish 100th? > After these are answered, then what is ethical and right? > Ed Holt RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
