Doesn't the wireless company have a "duty" of sorts to stay out of frequencies they're not assigned? I won't pretend to know much about this topic, but I thought that if they were found interfering with other frequencies they could be fined a considerable amount. Not to say that this completely keeps them from bleeding over into adjacent frequencies.
Also if your plane was shot down b/c of this type of interference wouldn't you have recourse against the provider interfering on your channel since they don't have the license to use it? I guess technically we don't have a license to use it other than that it's reserved for RC use. But I would think that if they're interfering with non-RC related equipment, on frequencies reserved for RC use, that they would be found at fault. Jared -----Original Message----- From: Len Revelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 9:31 PM To: Tom Watson Cc: RCSE Subject: Re: [RCSE] Broadband Over Powerline approved Unfortunately, the article's statement was one made while the FCC ignored presented evidence to the contrary. If utility companies' past history for maintenance is any indication wireless comms as we know it may soon cease to be usable. I have seen articles in which at least one company abandoned efforts because they could not contain the RFI. --- Tom Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The article I read stated that the HAM operator's > concerns "could be > managed" but nothing regarding R/C interference. ===== Len Revelle N9IJ "My career goal is to retire" RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
