|
A public forum, open to
opinion. Just voiced mine, it was
a joke… well half a joke. I am actually a very poor pilot, I just
will myself to fly well. I can’t afford to crash my ships. It is obvious folks enjoy talking about
themselves and their models. Ok What I am interested in opening up for discussion,
now that you took the bait… Many consider lighter models to be
universally superior to heavier models, using wing loading to determine overall
“goodness”. What I have learned through experience is that as
models get larger, and wing loadings go up they often fly (thermal, groove,
penetrate)much better than some
lightly loaded ships. Now for example, take a 4.5 meter 15 pound Sperber semi
scale sailplane with a 20 cell motor system on board. This plane flies like it
weighs 10 pounds. My suspicion is that span loading might be a more realistic
measure of a planes performance than raw wing loading data. I would also hazard
a guess that reynolds
numbers might be more pertinent in larger size sailplanes. (more meaningful) Any science minded folks wish to comment? JD Endless Mountain Models http://www.scalesoaring.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- At 05:31 AM 11/30/2004, John Derstine wrote: Is it that such topics generate great interest because they
are low risk (flaming)? Require no thought? or just perhaps everything worth
being discussed has been covered?
I want information, intelligent discussion, brilliantly
elucidated topics of interest.
|
- RE: [RCSE] my favorite topics John Derstine
- RE: [RCSE] my favorite topics Douglas, Brent
- Re: [RCSE] my favorite topics Bill Swingle

